- Plasma Prestige
- |
- Intrepid Legendary Member
Expressing my strong liberal views without shame. Favorite quotes below:
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
"One starts to live when he can live outside himself."
- Albert Einstein
Posted by: Buddha Milk
Posted by: Plasma Prestige
Posted by: Buddha Milk
Posted by: Plasma Prestige
Posted by: Buddha Milk
Yup, every single K/D thread is made by one of these two people.
*Sucks at the game and is annoyed that people have actual proof they suck / tries to give an excuse on why a low K/D is still good.
*Someone who is really good at the game and likes to brag about it since they have actual proof of it / calling anyone with a lower K/D bad or a scrub.
I don't see where I say a K/D below 1 or even at 1 is good.
You're implying that as long as your K/D is above a 1.0 your good.
Good is a meaningless term. If your K/D is above 1.0, your statistically superior to the majority. The margin by which you're better is likely going to demarcate the boundary of good/okay.
I get where you're coming from, but there is more to K/D then you realize. Ones ability to perform under pressure, tactics, communication, teammates, understanding of map flow, radar use, and pure natural ability in gaming.
You're describing skill, not K/D. Again, they are not synonymous. It's akin to intelligence and IQ.
I'll give you my own example. I have been playing Halo since CE in 2001. I would attribute much of my lackluster performance in many games to my vision problem (I am legally blind). I attribute some to lack of skill definitely, but it's not an absolute, and there are more factors to consider. For instance, really bright maps like Ragnarok and Haven I do poorly on. Darker maps like Abandon and Adrift I perform significantly better on.