- SweetTRIX
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"
Posted by: MadMax888
Posted by: SweetTRIX
Posted by: Mitochondrion
Because I want the product and the price tag isn't gonna put me off, but I don't really see why I should have that price tag so big when the price tag should be smaller. I'm going to get it either way, but I feel as though they're taking advantage of that and shooting up the price tag. I am still going to buy it, but I feel as though the game companies are taking the mick. That's what I don't like.
What is it exactly that makes you think the price tags should be smaller?To me, it seems that we have been getting less content recently for $60, and then a punch of paid DLC shortly after the game is released. That DLC should be part of the game we bought.
But is that an issue of shifting expectation, or are you actually getting less content? Are you so sure that the DLC should have been included, or if it is already on disc? I ask because these complaints often seem to be the same, but they are given given regardless.
Posted by: Mitochondrion
It's like it costs points just to change your damn gamer tag yet it's free on PSN. It's stupid. Arcade games cost like £10 worth of MS points, yet I've gotten full games for as little as £3. It's bonkers that Doom 2 costs more than Need for Speed Carbon...
That I totally get, there are some serious incosistencies from publishers and their software pricing. The thing between XBL and PSN isn't confusing at all, Sony is going to give away what MS knows they can charge for because Sony was second to market with their offering, simple as that.
[Edited on 12.05.2012 11:57 AM PST]