Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: British royality (arguments against)?
  • Subject: British royality (arguments against)?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: British royality (arguments against)?

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Use your head. The one on your shoulders. No really, just try. Please?

˙sɹǝʇndɯoɔ ɥʇıʍ pooƃ os ʇou ɯ,ı 'ǝɹǝɥ ʇǝƃ sıɥʇ pıp ʍoɥ 'lol

There really isn't a good case for getting rid of them, considering tourism and the rent Parliament collects from the land that is leased to them by the royal family in exchange for having their lives financed. If you dissolve that paid opulence, they would have to pay the royal family rent on the property they own, which would cost more than they currently do.

  • 12.06.2012 4:09 PM PDT
Subject: British royaity (arguments against)?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

the will to win is the will to destroy


Posted by: SawzeBawse
i want to know why they feel the need to tell the US every little thing going on with Kate and Will. im pretty sure no one over here gives a -blam!-.


probably cause there isnt any news the media wants to report. *cough cough* bad politics
all the wats

  • 12.06.2012 4:10 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3