Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Do you think the USA could have won WWII on its own?
  • Subject: Do you think the USA could have won WWII on its own?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3
Subject: Do you think the USA could have won WWII on its own?


Posted by: Co M4N

Posted by: Gen Petitt

Posted by: Co M4N

Posted by: Gen Petitt
No, Britian and the USA are the only countries that were nescesary.


So much fail in one post.

Russia was not NESCESARY key word read it, it means all that is needed Russia was helpful but not needed hell Berlin was literally given to the russian as a political manuaver by General Eisenhower as a way to prevent a cold war. Now how did that work out?


Where to begin.

The french were a big help for britain lending them time to prepare for the german onslught that was to come.

Australia was holding back then pushing the japs back at papua new guinea.

All the while Britain, french, Australian and new zealand forces were driving romel out of north africa and completely destroying italian forces.

Russian was holding back german blitzkreig then pushing germany back.

All the while america wasn't even in the war at that time.
Took 3 years for america to even get into the war.

So as I said so much fail in that post.

Yet during those early three years britian could barely feed itself, lost all of its teritories ala JAPAN.

Russian were loseing until idiot moves from Hitler and alot of supplies from the US of A

Those geullia fighters were only fighting because of British operaters trianing them and supplies from again the US of A, also they didnt begin fighting until 1942 America joined in 1941.

Meen while America was fighting a war on two fronts, and winning. They didn't get any help apart on the pacific front.

Britian was nessary to win, Russia was not stay on topic.

  • 12.06.2012 6:01 PM PDT

RIP - The Rev: February 9, 1981 – December 28, 2009
RIP - Mitch Lucker: October 20, 1984 - November 1, 2012
RIP - Dimebag Darrell: August 20, 1966 – December 8, 2004
RIP - Ronny James Dio: July 10, 1942 - May 16, 2010


Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: ABotelho

Posted by: Viper Skills
Defeated Japan AND Germany at the same time? Probably not. After they build the atom bomb, though, of course.

Even the atom bomb was a team effort though.


It was an American-funded and mostly American endeavor.

A refugee from war-torn Europe was, without a direct connection, essentially the backbone for that.

Aside from that, no, we could not have won.

  • 12.06.2012 6:01 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Co M4N
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Gen Petitt

Posted by: Co M4N

Posted by: Gen Petitt

Posted by: Co M4N

Posted by: Gen Petitt
No, Britian and the USA are the only countries that were nescesary.


So much fail in one post.

Russia was not NESCESARY key word read it, it means all that is needed Russia was helpful but not needed hell Berlin was literally given to the russian as a political manuaver by General Eisenhower as a way to prevent a cold war. Now how did that work out?


Where to begin.

The french were a big help for britain lending them time to prepare for the german onslught that was to come.

Australia was holding back then pushing the japs back at papua new guinea.

All the while Britain, french, Australian and new zealand forces were driving romel out of north africa and completely destroying italian forces.

Russian was holding back german blitzkreig then pushing germany back.

All the while america wasn't even in the war at that time.
Took 3 years for america to even get into the war.

So as I said so much fail in that post.

Yet during those early three years britian could barely feed itself, lost all of its teritories ala JAPAN.

Russian were loseing until idiot moves from Hitler and alot of supplies from the US of A

Those geullia fighters were only fighting because of British operaters trianing them and supplies from again the US of A, also they didnt begin fighting until 1942 America joined in 1941.

Meen while America was fighting a war on two fronts, and winning. They didn't get any help apart on the pacific front.

Britian was nessary to win, Russia was not stay on topic.



Idiot moves from hitler? It was the coldest winter in 50 years that helped russia. You do know that it wasn't just america invading on d-day right? And Australia was fighting along side you in the pacific the whole time.

And telling me to stay on topic?

Mate all I said in the first post replying to you was so much fail, YOU brought russia into that and I then countered your argument. YOU need to stay on topic mate.

  • 12.06.2012 6:11 PM PDT

HAY GUIZ! WERE ALL HISTORIANS SO WE SHOULD ACT LIKE WE'RE KNOWLAGEABLE ABOUT THIS STUFF!!














That was sarcasm. Everyone here is arguing like they know everything. NO ONE can say anything in this thread and expect to be taken seriously. There is an infinite number of possibility's. I dont believe that anyone can bring up enough facts/ideas to support their claim. We simply dont have enough knowledge to understand how the world would have reacted to these changes we are proposing.

  • 12.06.2012 6:14 PM PDT

Destruction is always a team effort

  • 12.06.2012 6:14 PM PDT

There is just something epic about pistols.

▀▄Halo 2 Strategy complete, Halo 3 Strategy in progress...▄▀
▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀MJOLNIR BATTLE TACTICS▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

Not at all. Russia was a HUGE ally in WWII, it cannot even be overstated. The majority of the resources the Germans were consuming were being spent trying to push the Eastern Front. Read this.

  • 12.06.2012 6:22 PM PDT

Posted by: A 3 Legged Goat
"Team shoot the wraith!"
"What's a team shoot and what's a wraith?!"
"It means we all shoot at the big blue thing together!"
"Okay!"
*starts betraying blue teammate*

hahahaha
good one.
no.

  • 12.06.2012 6:36 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • of 3