Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Serious question about your views on women
  • Subject: Serious question about your views on women
Subject: Serious question about your views on women

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.


Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

  • 12.08.2012 8:23 PM PDT

Didact's Reprisal -
Now is the time of our unworlding
One final effort is all that remains
And I am not afraid
We shall fulfill our promise
We fight for the grace of the Mantle
And this time none of you will be left behind

I never liked the concept of "casual" relationships, and only enter relationships if they have a potential for a future together. I don't think it's the best decision in the world to be casual about it and I certainly wouldn't recommend it, but hey, I don't know everything. To each their own.

  • 12.08.2012 8:24 PM PDT


Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.

  • 12.08.2012 8:24 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: jaythenerdkid
Do you think you have a conscious bias against women who have had multiple partners, or women with more relaxed attitudes towards relationships? If so, why?


Yes. Personally, I think sex is something to be reserved for the one person you know you love, and I tend to look down on people who sleep around. Yeah, it's somewhat incorrect, but it's what I've taught myself.

  • 12.08.2012 8:25 PM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.


Posted by: InvasionImminent

Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


This is carrying a dangerous implication that sex is wrong.

  • 12.08.2012 8:25 PM PDT

Posted by: Baph117
This is an incredible step forward to being able to cure Downss sybndonre mn humans bineg.s

Posted by: InvasionImminent
A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


No, it stems from barbaric and outdated ideals...

  • 12.08.2012 8:25 PM PDT

GAAAAYYY


Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

Whats the point of them? Aren't they just -blam!- buddies?

  • 12.08.2012 8:26 PM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.


Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

Whats the point of them? Aren't they just -blam!- buddies?


In many cases, yes. Two people who happen to enjoy the physical pleasure derived from sex. Where is the issue?

  • 12.08.2012 8:26 PM PDT

Hey guis what's goin on in this sig?

It was that Cracked article that made me lose all my respect for that author. Especially the "whore" segment.

  • 12.08.2012 8:27 PM PDT

The human element always mucks things up.

Fun hating poop eaters ITT.

  • 12.08.2012 8:27 PM PDT

Posted by: Baph117
This is an incredible step forward to being able to cure Downss sybndonre mn humans bineg.s

Posted by: Prototype117
Whats the point of them? Aren't they just -blam!- buddies?


I think you just answered your own question...

  • 12.08.2012 8:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: InvasionImminent

Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


This is carrying a dangerous implication that sex is wrong.


Which I think is somewhat laughable. If sex was something to never be done we'd be extinct.

  • 12.08.2012 8:27 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Yup.

I don't give a -blam!- about geek girls, but I think any person who has casual -blam!- relationships is not worth being with. I admit I'm old fashioned on this and almost all issues.

  • 12.08.2012 8:28 PM PDT

Posted by: Kurosaki_Kun

I know, right?
Jay acts like she's better than everyone else simply because she's a chick.
I hope she chokes to death.


Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

Whats the point of them? Aren't they just -blam!- buddies?
What's wrong with that?

Physical intimacy can be an extremely enjoyable activity when performed between two (or more!) consenting adults. There doesn't have to be any emotional significance to the act in order for it to be enjoyable or even worthwhile. I myself am a committed monogamist and I don't think I could enjoy being intimate with someone outside of a relationship, but that doesn't mean I look down on people who don't share that preference. Different people attach different meanings to sex, and none of those meanings are necessarily invalid as long as they're not harmful to anyone taking part.

  • 12.08.2012 8:28 PM PDT


Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: InvasionImminent

Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


This is carrying a dangerous implication that sex is wrong.

An implication that cannot be proven, because it is a view. However the majority would likely agree with me that "casual" relationships are just morally wrong because sex should be between the one you love.

But hey, different folks, different strokes.

  • 12.08.2012 8:28 PM PDT


Posted by: Seggi31
Posted by: InvasionImminent
A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


No, it stems from barbaric and outdated ideals...

So a sense of right and wrong stems from barbaric ideals? Sounds quite the opposite to me. Input from others?

  • 12.08.2012 8:29 PM PDT

Challenge me to a Hawaiian Punch chugging contest. I dare you.


Posted by: mubox47
$.50 in store credit.


Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)
"Casual, intimate" seems to be the problem itself. Intimacy and casualness seem to be on opposite of the spectrum when it comes to relationships. It doesnt make much sense to skip to the parts that come with a serious relationship without actually having a serious relationship.

Just my two cents.

And, for the record, i think guys that sleep around are just as sleezy as the girls that do it. But 'casual relationships' is a rather loose term. There's a difference between being casual and relaxed with relationships, and being a skank that sleeps around.

  • 12.08.2012 8:29 PM PDT

inb4hottopic

  • 12.08.2012 8:31 PM PDT

The Universe demands to be noticed, to be seen, and dutifully noted.

What use all those incredible firework dimensions if no eye fixes and reflects, no brain takes notes, no heart moves with passion at the display?

NASA answers the silent cry of the Cosmos for recognition.

NASA is the witness and we fellow witnesses to the endless deeps.


Posted by: Teh Teddy Bear

Posted by: Seggi31
[quote]Posted by: InvasionImminent
A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


No, it stems from barbaric and outdated ideals...



So looking out for those in need is barbaric and outdated?

  • 12.08.2012 8:32 PM PDT


Posted by: Teh Teddy Bear

Posted by: Seggi31
Posted by: InvasionImminent
A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


No, it stems from barbaric and outdated ideals...

So a sense of right and wrong stems from barbaric ideals? Sounds quite the opposite to me. Input from others?

Agreed. Even my dog knows it's wrong to eat my food when I leave the room. I can tell because he leaves the room and hides from me.

  • 12.08.2012 8:32 PM PDT


Posted by: And Im Here Too
Which I think is somewhat laughable. If sex was something to never be done we'd be extinct.

Nobody ever said that sex is wrong. We are discussing the morals of having it with people we don't intend to be with.

  • 12.08.2012 8:32 PM PDT

GAAAAYYY


Posted by: jaythenerdkid

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: Viper Skills

Posted by: Prototype117

Posted by: spartain ken 15
People shouldn't have multiple partners, regardless of gender.

This. Learn to control yourselves. Must you really always have a male doll to tell you your beautiful and to kiss your ass all day.


So what's wrong with casual, intimate relationships? Please cite an argument that does not stem from religion, thanks. :)

Whats the point of them? Aren't they just -blam!- buddies?
What's wrong with that?

Physical intimacy can be an extremely enjoyable activity when performed between two (or more!) consenting adults. There doesn't have to be any emotional significance to the act in order for it to be enjoyable or even worthwhile. I myself am a committed monogamist and I don't think I could enjoy being intimate with someone outside of a relationship, but that doesn't mean I look down on people who don't share that preference. Different people attach different meanings to sex, and none of those meanings are necessarily invalid as long as they're not harmful to anyone taking part.

Then it will become a habit which will lead to divorce and cheating. You will find it hard to marry and you probably wont make a proper family.

  • 12.08.2012 8:32 PM PDT

Posted by: Baph117
This is an incredible step forward to being able to cure Downss sybndonre mn humans bineg.s

Posted by: Teh Teddy Bear
So a sense of right and wrong stems from barbaric ideals? Sounds quite the opposite to me. Input from others?


Morality in the past has usually not come from introspection or critical thought rather than compulsion, and when it has, it's often outdated and surpassed by modern ideals.

Posted by: Muffin enforcer
So looking out for those in need is barbaric and outdated?


No, our ideas of morality come from barbaric and outdated methods of arriving at ethical conclusions. That doesn't mean they're necessarily wrong, but it does mean that you can't say they're right just because we happened to be compelled to think so.

Posted by: Prototype117
Then it will become a habit which will lead to divorce and cheating. You will find it hard to marry and you probably wont make a proper family.


And what's wrong with that?

[Edited on 12.08.2012 8:36 PM PST]

  • 12.08.2012 8:33 PM PDT


Posted by: InvasionImminent

Posted by: Teh Teddy Bear

Posted by: Seggi31
Posted by: InvasionImminent
A sense of wrong and right does not stem from religion.


No, it stems from barbaric and outdated ideals...

So a sense of right and wrong stems from barbaric ideals? Sounds quite the opposite to me. Input from others?

Agreed. Even my dog knows it's wrong to eat my food when I leave the room. I can tell because he leaves the room and hides from me.

What does that have to do with anything. i.e. how is this an outdated concept?

  • 12.08.2012 8:35 PM PDT

"Life is constantly fleeting from your grasp even from the very day it's bestowed upon you, but the shadow of death is always there, waiting for its chance to take you away."

"Even though many may not think so, ignorance and innocence are one and the same. The only difference is that one sounds nicer."

"I once knew a man who spent his entire life contemplating where we go after our death....it's a shame he realized it a second too late to tell anyone."

People who view sex as a casual thing, and this is for both men and women, disgust me greatly. I won't openly admit it out of the blue, or actively attack people who hold those views, but I will let them know of my strong disapproval if my opinion of it is asked, like now for instance.

  • 12.08.2012 8:35 PM PDT