Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Should a license be required to have your own children?
  • Subject: Should a license be required to have your own children?
Subject: Should a license be required to have your own children?

iPhone 4S 64GB Black.

What would they do to stop people from having a child? I mean, there'll be thousands of children born without licences, and the rules would be constantly broken. It's impossible to enforce.

  • 12.11.2012 4:31 PM PDT
Subject: Should a license be required to have children?
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

They call me graland.

Posted by: Disambiguation
Posted by: Garland
There is no legitimate reason to support such blatant violations of human rights.
Overpopulation.
Nope. Birth rates have plateaued in industrialised nations. Excessive child-rearing is only a problem in developing countries, where it would be far more difficult to impossible to licence parents. On top of that, easily accessible birth control is a far better alternative than such draconian legislation.

And regardless, this is a debate about licencing parents, not about limiting the number of children they can have.

  • 12.11.2012 4:33 PM PDT
Subject: Should a license be required to have your own children?


Posted by: FLpump
u mad
u mad
u mad
u mad
u mad
u mad




Brb 7k+ posts ever since May
Brb made over 50+ accounts in the last 1-2 years+
Brb sociopathic internet life style
Brb video game forum of peace


phaggot


50 accounts?

Sociopathic life? I've never lied about my life on here.

Again. I really just wish we could meet.

Also? Why are you saying I'm mad? I'm clearly not. It's just funny to me how you make no truthful statements

  • 12.11.2012 4:33 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

God you sound/are like the biggest qeueer ever


Literally kill yourself







Just remember that while you call these guys out on B.net you're the one who's made triple digit accounts, sits on B.net for 3 hours + a day and has over 7k posts in 6 1/2 months ( probably more if I include your alts ).

Not even gonna argue with you becuase you're a literal phaggot

  • 12.11.2012 4:36 PM PDT

Ratermelon416

Definitely.
One should have a stable life, pass some measure of literacy or other academic tests, and be healthy in order to have children

  • 12.11.2012 4:36 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Disambiguation
Posted by: Iron Div is Pro
Violate the basic right of procreation?

Sorry OP. No.
Seems to be working for China.
Posted by: Octaian
Posted by: Disambiguation
Posted by: Octaian
So what if a child is born through unlawlful acts?

What then?
The child is sent to a government operated foster home and the parents are sent to Australia.

Then a lot of creeps would overrun Australia.
Australia is already full of creeps.


Point being what? I wouldn't say "works" by any means. You think the general populace is happy that they are restricted in such a way? Of course there is the alternative to leave their native country if they truly wanted but let's be honest, not everyone could if they wanted to.

Regardless. Placing sanctions on who can and can't have children is insane. Not that it would ever be passed to begin with. However in the chance that something like this became a feasible political discussion I'd vote against it.

Should all parents be parents? Of course not. However that's their right. It's also why social service exists. Nothing is full proof, however given my experience in the field, state run facilities are not as grand or helpful as some assume.

  • 12.11.2012 4:36 PM PDT


Posted by: FLpump
God you sound/are like the biggest qeueer ever


Literally kill yourself







Just remember that while you call these guys out on B.net you're the one who's made triple digit accounts, sits on B.net for 3 hours + a day and has over 7k posts in 6 1/2 months ( probably more if I include your alts ).

Not even gonna argue with you becuase you're a literal phaggot


Lol just another jelly Internet tough guy.

Cya

  • 12.11.2012 4:37 PM PDT
Subject: Should a license be required to have children?

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself."
-Nietzsche

Posted by: Garland
Nope. Birth rates have plateaued in industrialised nations. Excessive child-rearing is only a problem in developing countries, where it would be far more difficult to impossible to licence parents. On top of that, easily accessible birth control is a far better alternative than such draconian legislation.
But birth control access is being blocked in many developing countries by their governing bodies and in some instances by the church. There are even large political action groups here in the U.S. who want to make contraceptives difficult or impossible to obtain.

  • 12.11.2012 4:37 PM PDT
Subject: Should a license be required to have your own children?

Hi! How you doin'?

Sometimes, all you need are a couple giant explosions to get you through the day.


Posted by: FLpump

Posted by: Codename 207

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: FLpump
lol you've been doing the same thing ever since like April


Get a life srs


The same thing? Explain please.

Also. I wish we could meet in real life. Just to show you how great my life is.

A life so great, apparently, that you've taken to attempting to insult people in a backwater internet forum.

Seriously, you don't have ANYTHING better to do?


You're the reason why he does this. You actually believe the bullchittery this guy says and has been saying for years.

When did I state that? If my statement implied as much, let me clarify; I doubt he's telling the truth. If he is, he's wasting his time.

  • 12.11.2012 4:37 PM PDT


Posted by: Codename 207

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: FLpump
lol you've been doing the same thing ever since like April


Get a life srs


The same thing? Explain please.

Also. I wish we could meet in real life. Just to show you how great my life is.

A life so great, apparently, that you've taken to attempting to insult people in a backwater internet forum.

Seriously, you don't have ANYTHING better to do?


I really don't. I'm sitting here bored at work.

  • 12.11.2012 4:39 PM PDT

Hi! How you doin'?

Sometimes, all you need are a couple giant explosions to get you through the day.


Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: Codename 207

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: FLpump
lol you've been doing the same thing ever since like April


Get a life srs


The same thing? Explain please.

Also. I wish we could meet in real life. Just to show you how great my life is.

A life so great, apparently, that you've taken to attempting to insult people in a backwater internet forum.

Seriously, you don't have ANYTHING better to do?


I really don't. I'm sitting here bored at work.

If you're able to mess around on the internet, there are other places you could be besides here. Why don't you go there instead?

  • 12.11.2012 4:44 PM PDT


Posted by: Codename 207

If you're able to mess around on the internet, there are other places you could be besides here. Why don't you go there instead?


Cause I like this site? Same reason everyone else is here

  • 12.11.2012 4:46 PM PDT

The world is not beautiful: And that, in a way, lends it a sort of beauty.

~Kino's Journey

To enforce it just make it so that any services the child needs (like a school education or medical attention) would need a license, if no license is provided then the child is taken away.

Of course, to make it work you need to create a license that can't be lost, once that's out of the way the system has very little problems.

  • 12.11.2012 4:47 PM PDT

Does anyone have lotion?
*Raises hand*
Is mayonnaise a lotion?


Posted by: Safran888

Posted by: ICanHazRecon911

Posted by: Safran888

Posted by: ICanHazRecon911

Posted by: Screamo Luvr
No. Impossible to enforce.


Saw this reply a lot already. Perhaps a hefty fine could be placed on those who had unlicensed children, and have possible rights taken away. The children, as previously said, could be taken to government-owned foster homes.
So let's say a poor person has a baby (many people listed moderate-high income as a requirement to have a baby). So now, instead of trying to help them take care of the baby they love, which they created, you want to take away their baby and fine them?


Obviously if they had a baby without the correct documents, they are irresponsible and inconsiderate, especially if they are bringing a child into the meager world of the lower class, rendering as them unable to be decent parents for a child.

Also, define poor. Poor people can actually be rather well off to support a child or two, but I'm thinking you are talking about very poor, like living in a run-down house in a crime-filled neighborhood barely surviving.
For the sake of this argument, I am defining poor as having $1 less than whatever arbitrary value you happen to have assigned as the cutoff.

And what if the child isn't found to be "illegitimate" until he or she is about 10 years old? Will the child's wishes have any impact on whether or not they get to stay with their family?

And if I have a child, and later lose eligibility to have more kids, will I lose my first child as well?


I had no cutoff, but just wanted to know the basic conditions of what "poor" life you imagined.

Plus, your two questions are the point of this thread. You state the conditions you believe are righteous.

  • 12.11.2012 4:47 PM PDT

Hi! How you doin'?

Sometimes, all you need are a couple giant explosions to get you through the day.


Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: Codename 207

If you're able to mess around on the internet, there are other places you could be besides here. Why don't you go there instead?


Cause I like this site? Same reason everyone else is here

If you like the site, why do you ridicule the community? After all, the community is what makes a forum. Do you enjoy ridiculing the community like this?

  • 12.11.2012 4:50 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:



Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: Codename 207

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: FLpump
lol you've been doing the same thing ever since like April


Get a life srs[/quote]

The same thing? Explain please.

Also. I wish we could meet in real life. Just to show you how great my life is.

A life so great, apparently, that you've taken to attempting to insult people in a backwater internet forum.

Seriously, you don't have ANYTHING better to do?


I really don't. I'm sitting here bored at work.

If you're able to mess around on the internet, there are other places you could be besides here. Why don't you go there instead?



lol because he can't
He goes on this forum because retards like you argue with him and make him feel like something he's not. The only real people on here who aren't actually trolls and brag about their social life/life style success like that guy are in the SV group and even that group is full of ragin halo nerds mainly.

I use to post here often and than this forum got extremely boring and hom0. This forum is x1000 better


http://forum.bodybuilding.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19

[Edited on 12.11.2012 4:51 PM PST]

  • 12.11.2012 4:50 PM PDT

Hell no.

You cant regulate sex. Its one of the few things that we all have in common, and its one of the few things humanity will hold dear. You cant regulate something so universal.

  • 12.11.2012 4:54 PM PDT


Posted by: FLpump


Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: Codename 207

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: FLpump
lol you've been doing the same thing ever since like April


Get a life srs[/quote]

The same thing? Explain please.

Also. I wish we could meet in real life. Just to show you how great my life is.

A life so great, apparently, that you've taken to attempting to insult people in a backwater internet forum.

Seriously, you don't have ANYTHING better to do?


I really don't. I'm sitting here bored at work.

If you're able to mess around on the internet, there are other places you could be besides here. Why don't you go there instead?



lol because he can't
He goes on this forum because retards like you argue with him and make him feel like something he's not. The only real people on here who aren't actually trolls and brag about their social life/life style success like that guy are in the SV group and even that group is full of ragin halo nerds mainly.

I use to post here often and than this forum got extremely boring and hom0. This forum is x1000 better


http://forum.bodybuilding.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19


Hahahahahaha omg you lift? You're so tough.

  • 12.11.2012 4:54 PM PDT


Posted by: Codename 207

Posted by: DatDudeBV

Posted by: Codename 207

If you're able to mess around on the internet, there are other places you could be besides here. Why don't you go there instead?


Cause I like this site? Same reason everyone else is here

If you like the site, why do you ridicule the community? After all, the community is what makes a forum. Do you enjoy ridiculing the community like this?


I don't. I actually like being part of this community.

  • 12.11.2012 4:55 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: ICanHazRecon911
I had no cutoff, but just wanted to know the basic conditions of what "poor" life you imagined.

Plus, your two questions are the point of this thread. You state the conditions you believe are righteous.
I believe there are no conditions under which a license should be required to have kids.

  • 12.11.2012 4:56 PM PDT
Subject: Should a license be required to have children?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH

Now where have I seen this thread before?

  • 12.11.2012 4:57 PM PDT
Subject: Should a license be required to have your own children?

I do seriously question why some people have had kids though.

  • 12.11.2012 4:58 PM PDT

This is now my main account. My former account was xKingGhidorahx. I've been on this site since 2009.

Of course not. That's the dumbest suggestion I've ever heard.

  • 12.11.2012 5:00 PM PDT

youtube.com/whatsakillingspree

Posted by: ICanHazRecon911

Posted by: Screamo Luvr
No. Impossible to enforce.


Saw this reply a lot already. Perhaps a hefty fine could be placed on those who had unlicensed children, and have possible rights taken away. The children, as previously said, could be taken to government-owned foster homes.

Unconstitutional.

  • 12.11.2012 5:01 PM PDT
Subject: Should a license be required to have children?

No, that would be an incredibly dumb thing to do.

  • 12.11.2012 5:06 PM PDT