Posted by: Dreadnough7
Posted by: CharlesBrown33
Posted by: Dreadnough7
Posted by: DIGITAL SK1z1lz
A better judgment call would simply have been a halo 3 clone. it really would have. because even though people would say that, it would still be far better than what it is.
If Halo 4 was just a 3 clone. I wouldn't have bothered in buying it, I already have Halo 3, why repeating the same thing? Isn't that why people hate CoD, for its lack of innovation?
Correction: Isn't that why people LOVE CoD? For sticking to its roots and not changing a working formula?
Regardless if the CoD formula is good or bad, or competitive or casual; this makes the industry stagnant,repetitive and afraid of trying new ideas. I do not totally agree with 343i's design choices, but I give them props for actually trying and adding new things to the formula (See FWD, SpOps).
Hopefully with their experience with 4, they'll make a more consistent game, be it with TU's or Halo 5.
Nope. 343 had one shot, and it was called Halo 4. After managing Reach for a year, there's no excuse. They've proven their incompetency to me.