Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Are you homophobic flood?
  • Subject: Are you homophobic flood?
Subject: Are you homophobic flood?

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: George S Patton
Am I afraid of g@y people? No
Do I approve of the g@y lifestyle? No
Am I a homophobe? No

Why do people thing that who ever doesnt approve of -blam!- relationships is a bigot? I disapprove of -blam!- relationships, but I believe that everyone is worthy of my respect.
Because disproving of someone's relationship is a silly thing to do. Why do you disprove of two people in a loving relationship simply based on their orientation? It has zero effect on you.

  • 12.12.2012 4:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

13.72 billion years in the making.

On December 1st, 2012, I met Neil deGrasse Tyson. I shook the man's hand, and even made him laugh. Not much else to do with my life now.

Plus, homo-blam!-ity is linked to a number of other genetic triats, so I won't persist in upholding this ridiculous notion that it's a "lifestyle choice." And even if it was, I still wouldn't care. Who cares if it's against the reproductive methods that humans have evolved? It's not like nature has an intent, so why would I act like it does? It by no means goes "against nature."

  • 12.12.2012 4:00 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

I understand nothing because my life is a conspiracy.


Posted by: haloplayer2kill

Posted by: lime013
I'm hydrophobic.

I fear the water.


Needed to fix that, you can hate water but still not be hydrophobic (fear of), so i needed to change your statement to make more sense.
It was a science joke, but I see your point. I don't fear the water, just to clear things up.

[Edited on 12.12.2012 4:02 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 4:00 PM PDT

If we disagree, it's nothing personal, opinions are opinions.
Antagonizing me to build a false sense of worth is so damn cute.

Brighten your day with science.

Posted by: George S Patton
I disapprove of -blam!- relationships,

There's no rational reason to be.

  • 12.12.2012 4:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: George S Patton
Am I afraid of g@y people? No
Do I approve of the g@y lifestyle? No
Am I a homophobe? No

Why do people thing that who ever doesnt approve of -blam!- relationships is a bigot? I disapprove of -blam!- relationships, but I believe that everyone is worthy of my respect.
Because disproving of someone's relationship is a silly thing to do. Why do you disprove of two people in a loving relationship simply based on their orientation? It has zero effect on you.


Worthy of his respect, yet doesn't respect their orientation.

  • 12.12.2012 4:03 PM PDT


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: George S Patton
Am I afraid of g@y people? No
Do I approve of the g@y lifestyle? No
Am I a homophobe? No

Why do people thing that who ever doesnt approve of -blam!- relationships is a bigot? I disapprove of -blam!- relationships, but I believe that everyone is worthy of my respect.
Because disproving of someone's relationship is a silly thing to do. Why do you disprove of two people in a loving relationship simply based on their orientation? It has zero effect on you.

I'm not going to act like I support something I dont believe in, and I wont stay Idle while the things I believe in are attacked.

  • 12.12.2012 4:03 PM PDT

Nope, I'm bi.

  • 12.12.2012 4:04 PM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: George S Patton

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: George S Patton
Am I afraid of g@y people? No
Do I approve of the g@y lifestyle? No
Am I a homophobe? No

Why do people thing that who ever doesnt approve of -blam!- relationships is a bigot? I disapprove of -blam!- relationships, but I believe that everyone is worthy of my respect.
Because disproving of someone's relationship is a silly thing to do. Why do you disprove of two people in a loving relationship simply based on their orientation? It has zero effect on you.

I'm not going to act like I support something I dont believe in, and I wont stay Idle while the things I believe in are attacked.
What's not to support? Why should certain people not enjoy the same rights that you and I enjoy? Especially when it is determined by something personal that doesn't have any effect on anyone else?

  • 12.12.2012 4:05 PM PDT


Posted by: brandorobot

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: George S Patton
Am I afraid of g@y people? No
Do I approve of the g@y lifestyle? No
Am I a homophobe? No

Why do people thing that who ever doesnt approve of -blam!- relationships is a bigot? I disapprove of -blam!- relationships, but I believe that everyone is worthy of my respect.
Because disproving of someone's relationship is a silly thing to do. Why do you disprove of two people in a loving relationship simply based on their orientation? It has zero effect on you.


Worthy of his respect, yet doesn't respect their orientation.

Orentation =/= person. People arnt just defined by the orentation, beliefs, looks, or anything else like that. Because I disapprove of something does not meen I disapprove of the person, it meens I dissaprove of the action.

Id love to debate some more, but I have to go to karate. Maybe Ill be on In a few hours again.

  • 12.12.2012 4:06 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: George S Patton

Posted by: brandorobot

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: George S Patton
Am I afraid of g@y people? No
Do I approve of the g@y lifestyle? No
Am I a homophobe? No

Why do people thing that who ever doesnt approve of -blam!- relationships is a bigot? I disapprove of -blam!- relationships, but I believe that everyone is worthy of my respect.
Because disproving of someone's relationship is a silly thing to do. Why do you disprove of two people in a loving relationship simply based on their orientation? It has zero effect on you.


Worthy of his respect, yet doesn't respect their orientation.

Orentation =/= person. People arnt just defined by the orentation, beliefs, looks, or anything else like that. Because I disapprove of something does not meen I disapprove of the person, it meens I dissaprove of the action.

Id love to debate some more, but I have to go to karate. Maybe Ill be on In a few hours again.


It's part of who they are. So if you don't respect them as they are then you don't respect them.

[Edited on 12.12.2012 4:12 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 4:12 PM PDT

Yes

  • 12.12.2012 4:18 PM PDT

Like the Honey Badger, I don't care

  • 12.12.2012 4:54 PM PDT


Posted by: brandorobot

Posted by: George S Patton

Posted by: brandorobot

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: George S Patton
Am I afraid of g@y people? No
Do I approve of the g@y lifestyle? No
Am I a homophobe? No

Why do people thing that who ever doesnt approve of -blam!- relationships is a bigot? I disapprove of -blam!- relationships, but I believe that everyone is worthy of my respect.
Because disproving of someone's relationship is a silly thing to do. Why do you disprove of two people in a loving relationship simply based on their orientation? It has zero effect on you.


Worthy of his respect, yet doesn't respect their orientation.

Orentation =/= person. People arnt just defined by the orentation, beliefs, looks, or anything else like that. Because I disapprove of something does not meen I disapprove of the person, it meens I dissaprove of the action.

Id love to debate some more, but I have to go to karate. Maybe Ill be on In a few hours again.


It's part of who they are. So if you don't respect them as they are then you don't respect them.

Not true. For example: I know a girl who sleeps around alot. But she still trys to be a good person, and isnt just defined by her love of sax. I still respect this girl, because she has another side of her. Shes not just smex. Shes a swimmer. She plays piano. Shes a good sister and shes friendly. She has good things about her. I dont think it alright to sleap around like she does, but I still respect her. People arnt made up of one thing, their made up of everything they do. Their made up by who they love an who love them. They are NOT just their smexual orentation, hobbies, or something else like that.

  • 12.12.2012 5:58 PM PDT

I am the Troll King.

I don't necessarily approve of EVERYTHING they do (more so how some of them act) but they are people and there's really nothing wrong with them.

  • 12.12.2012 6:06 PM PDT

I am a pharmaceutical scientist. I received my Masters degree in Pharmaceutics from the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia in 2010, after working as a Pharmacist for 4 years. I currently work in King of Prussia, PA, and focus on the analytical chemistry of small molecule APIs. My clients include some of the most well known big pharma companies in the world.


Posted by: I Judge Bread I

Posted by: Dback139
I don't exhibit anger or fear so, no, I'm not homophobic. However, I do disagree with that kind of activity, simply because it is not what nature intended. It's a similar reason to why I don't drink milk: Humans are the only animals that drink milk after infancy, so in my mind, if other species aren't doing it, and it's not necessary to survive, then it's not a practical investment of my time.


It's not what nature intended? Do you know anything about nature? Because it's actually completely normal.

Also your milk argument is terrible, no other species wears clothes, drives cars, uses the internet.

Yet here you are making moronic statements when you should be living in a cave according to your logic.
So should you with your ignorant judgement of me.

Animals don't engage in that behavior as a means to form a relationship, they base it off the instinct of pleasure. So, unless you're implying the -blam!--blam!-ity is void of emotion, and only engaged upon solely for pleasure, (because remember, -blam!--blam!-ity is not defined by intercourse, but rather the union of two members of the same gender), then the argument holds no weight on your end.

Also, to those trying to debunk my milk argument by citing clothes, internet, etc., you are missing the point. I'm referring to organic activities that provide a necessary means to an end. Is milk bad for you? Not unless you're lactose-intolerant. But if it's so vital and necessary for survival, then other animals would rely on it for nourishment throughout life. As such, -blam!--blam!-ity is not necessary for survival, whereas copulation between a male and female is.

You see, people are too quick to judge, and rely on the media to form their opinions for them. All of you are absolutely free to believe what you wish, I won't judge you for it. All I ask is that you remain open to the tolerance of perfectly acceptable and valid counterarguments to the topic at hand.

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:42 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:20 PM PDT

Oh dear, this thread....

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:30 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:26 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I can't be scared of my self.

If being Bi-blam!- counts.

  • 12.12.2012 9:27 PM PDT

Posted by: Dropship dude
No, acnboy. Spartain Ken 15 is a lesser being. Much like the bacteria that lives in your shi­t.
Posted by: mike120593
My shi­t bacteria takes offense to that comparison.

Don't make me lel. You won't like me when I lel.

Posted by: Dback139
All I ask is that you remain open to the tolerance of perfectly acceptable and valid counterarguments to the topic at hand.
this would be an okay thing to say if your argument was any of those things

  • 12.12.2012 9:28 PM PDT


Posted by: Dback139

Posted by: I Judge Bread I

Posted by: Dback139
I don't exhibit anger or fear so, no, I'm not homophobic. However, I do disagree with that kind of activity, simply because it is not what nature intended. It's a similar reason to why I don't drink milk: Humans are the only animals that drink milk after infancy, so in my mind, if other species aren't doing it, and it's not necessary to survive, then it's not a practical investment of my time.


It's not what nature intended? Do you know anything about nature? Because it's actually completely normal.

Also your milk argument is terrible, no other species wears clothes, drives cars, uses the internet.

Yet here you are making moronic statements when you should be living in a cave according to your logic.
So should you with your ignorant judgement of me.

Animals don't engage in that behavior as a means to form a relationship, they base it off the instinct of pleasure. So, unless you're implying the -blam!--blam!-ity is void of emotion, and only engaged upon solely for pleasure, (because remember, -blam!--blam!-ity is not defined by intercourse, but rather the union of two members of the same gender), then the argument holds no weight on your end.

Also, to those trying to debunk my milk argument by citing clothes, internet, etc., you are missing the point. I'm referring to organic activities that provide a means to an end. Is milk bad for you? Not unless you're lactose-intolerant. But if it's so vital and necessary for survival, then other animals would rely on it for nourishment throughout life. As such, -blam!--blam!-ity is not necessary for survival, whereas copulation between a male and female is.

You see, people are too quick to judge, and rely on the media to form their opinions for them. All of you are absolutely free to believe what you wish, I won't judge you for it. All I ask is that you remain open to the tolerance of perfectly acceptable and valid counterarguments to the topic at hand.


Other species of animals don't use the Internet, which is a means of communication. I think anyone would agree that communication is an "organic function".

The Internet is not necessary to survive.

But here you are.

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:31 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:29 PM PDT

Posted by: Dropship dude
No, acnboy. Spartain Ken 15 is a lesser being. Much like the bacteria that lives in your shi­t.
Posted by: mike120593
My shi­t bacteria takes offense to that comparison.

Don't make me lel. You won't like me when I lel.

Posted by: George S Patton
I dissaprove of the action
but you have no logical basis for doing this

  • 12.12.2012 9:29 PM PDT

Whoops, double post.

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:31 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:30 PM PDT

I am a pharmaceutical scientist. I received my Masters degree in Pharmaceutics from the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia in 2010, after working as a Pharmacist for 4 years. I currently work in King of Prussia, PA, and focus on the analytical chemistry of small molecule APIs. My clients include some of the most well known big pharma companies in the world.


Posted by: random no337
Posted by: Dback139
All I ask is that you remain open to the tolerance of perfectly acceptable and valid counterarguments to the topic at hand.
this would be an okay thing to say if your argument was any of those things
It most certainly is tolerant and acceptable. I never said I have anything against people in those types of relationships; I am merely saying I disapprove of it from a practical standpoint. It serves no purpose in advancing the human species. I have not implied my views to mean anything more or less than that of an issue of practicality.

You can try to prove me wrong on this, but unless the human species can now propagate by copulation between two humans of the same gender in an organic fashion, then my point is essentially proven.

At the end of the day, if two people are happy in that type of union, then that's wonderful for them. It doesn't mean I have to give them my blessing. I can respect the personal choice; however, I'd certainly question the logic from a genetic standpoint. And before people say the people don't choose to be ghey but rather that it's genetic, there have been as many studies that say its true as those that say its false.

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:35 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:31 PM PDT

Why you quote yourself?

EDIT: Nvm.

Posted by: coolmike699

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:31 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:31 PM PDT

No, I just don't like flaming homo-blam!-s. If you're ghey, keep it to yourself, don't flaunt it.

  • 12.12.2012 9:31 PM PDT

Key

Thank god for the amazing anonymous person who came up with this.

I hate the word homophobia. It's not a phobia. You are not scared. You are an -blam!-.

©

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:45 PM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:34 PM PDT