Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Are you homophobic flood?
  • Subject: Are you homophobic flood?
Subject: Are you homophobic flood?

Studies show that men think about sex every 7 seconds. I do my best to eat hotdogs in under 6, just so things don't get weird.

Please allow me to introduce Myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste
I've been around for a long, long year
Stole many a man's soul and faith

By the way, the -blam!- community issued this ultimatum about same sex marriage.

  • 12.12.2012 9:45 AM PDT


Posted by: NinjaLord77

Posted by: TooMuchAlcohol

Posted by: ABotelho

Posted by: TooMuchAlcohol
You don't hear a hetero-blam!- person saying they are hetero all the time.

WAT.

I'm sorry, you are right. But I'm hetero-blam!-.

I'm hetero-blam!-.

I'm hetero-blam!-, so I'm hetero-blam!-.

Anyway, I probably can't explain it well enough.


Maybe it's the alcohol

Haha, that could very well be the answer.
How did you know, your ninja-sense was tingeling?

  • 12.12.2012 9:47 AM PDT


Posted by: Modern Designer

Posted by: foreveraloner35

Posted by: Modern Designer

Posted by: foreveraloner35
Isn't that a bit like saying that having ramps for wheelchairs is illogical because the people are disabled?

Correct me if I'm wrong

Yeah, you're wrong. Disabilities like paraplegia are caused by accidents and need necessarily compensation and support. -blam!--blam!-ity is just a disorder that shouldn't be condoned in any way. Support and condoning are two different things. Basically giving them the right to marry is like saying -blam!--blam!-ity is okay.


Ok, but you do understand that ghey people have a right to be happy like the rest of us? They were born that way and they can't help it, and they will always be like that. So why deny them rights and make life harder for them?

Actually that's a good point.


:)

See, people just need to open their eyes :)

  • 12.12.2012 9:49 AM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: Modern Designer

Posted by: ABotelho

Posted by: Modern Designer
It's a disorder because it goes against the necessary qualification of life which is reproduction. Sure they have the absolute, but lack the drive, which is a neurological disorder. Pretty simple.

Why does that make it a disorder? Even if it was a disorder, why should that stop them from having the rights of others?

Some people are born infertile. Should they not be allowed to marry? Others are born paralyzed making them unable to reproduce. Should they not be able to marry? What about the individuals who choose to not reproduce? Should they be unable to marry as well?

Well infertile people still have the drive, but not the capability. They have a physical disorder but not a mental disorder. That criteria makes it okay for them to marry. Paralyzed people can to, but I don't see how that would work out well. As for the people who choose not to have kids, that's okay.
But -blam!--blam!-ity and bi-blam!-ity are not a mental disorder. Even if they were, we still let people with mental disorders marry. Why is this one different?

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:51 AM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:50 AM PDT

Now go make me some tea.


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: Modern Designer

Posted by: ABotelho

Posted by: Modern Designer
It's a disorder because it goes against the necessary qualification of life which is reproduction. Sure they have the absolute, but lack the drive, which is a neurological disorder. Pretty simple.

Why does that make it a disorder? Even if it was a disorder, why should that stop them from having the rights of others?

Some people are born infertile. Should they not be allowed to marry? Others are born paralyzed making them unable to reproduce. Should they not be able to marry? What about the individuals who choose to not reproduce? Should they be unable to marry as well?

Well infertile people still have the drive, but not the capability. They have a physical disorder but not a mental disorder. That criteria makes it okay for them to marry. Paralyzed people can to, but I don't see how that would work out well. As for the people who choose not to have kids, that's okay.
But -blam!--blam!-ity and bi-blam!-ity is not a mental disorder. Even if it was, we still let people with mental disorders marry. Why is this one different?


Not that I have anything against -blam!-s, but if they're allowed to marry, then furries will want to, too. Then pedofiles, and raccoons will want to marry trashcans

  • 12.12.2012 9:51 AM PDT

Artes, Scientia, Veritas

Sapere Aude

"But I do not think we're invincible"

No, because I'm not a bigot.

Also, can we stop using "homophobic" and use the much more accurate term "heterosexist" so homophobes can stop going "no, because I'm not afraid of them; I just hate them!" and think that they've somehow mitigated the extreme bigotry they display?

  • 12.12.2012 9:51 AM PDT

No.

If you love someone, you love someone. yeah?

  • 12.12.2012 9:52 AM PDT

My Brahman is ready.

The only homophobia I have is against those who like to show it all out in public and stuff. That's the worst way to try and support -blam!- marriage (ie, -blam!- Pride Parade).

If you want for it to be legalized, then get it right. But no, I don't hate -blam!-s, just those who love to show it out in public, just like the bronies, furries, etc.

  • 12.12.2012 9:53 AM PDT


Posted by: TooMuchAlcohol

Posted by: NinjaLord77

Posted by: TooMuchAlcohol

Posted by: ABotelho

Posted by: TooMuchAlcohol
You don't hear a hetero-blam!- person saying they are hetero all the time.

WAT.

I'm sorry, you are right. But I'm hetero-blam!-.

I'm hetero-blam!-.

I'm hetero-blam!-, so I'm hetero-blam!-.

Anyway, I probably can't explain it well enough.


Maybe it's the alcohol

Haha, that could very well be the answer.
How did you know, your ninja-sense was tingeling?


I just know man, I just know

  • 12.12.2012 9:53 AM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: TheDerRitter

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: Modern Designer

Posted by: ABotelho

Posted by: Modern Designer
It's a disorder because it goes against the necessary qualification of life which is reproduction. Sure they have the absolute, but lack the drive, which is a neurological disorder. Pretty simple.

Why does that make it a disorder? Even if it was a disorder, why should that stop them from having the rights of others?

Some people are born infertile. Should they not be allowed to marry? Others are born paralyzed making them unable to reproduce. Should they not be able to marry? What about the individuals who choose to not reproduce? Should they be unable to marry as well?

Well infertile people still have the drive, but not the capability. They have a physical disorder but not a mental disorder. That criteria makes it okay for them to marry. Paralyzed people can to, but I don't see how that would work out well. As for the people who choose not to have kids, that's okay.
But -blam!--blam!-ity and bi-blam!-ity is not a mental disorder. Even if it was, we still let people with mental disorders marry. Why is this one different?


Not that I have anything against -blam!-s, but if they're allowed to marry, then furries will want to, too. Then pedofiles, and raccoons will want to marry trashcans
Why can't furries get married? As long as they're consenting adults, it should be legal. As for the last two, they are not both legal, consenting adults, so they cannot marry.

  • 12.12.2012 9:53 AM PDT

Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"


Posted by: Enemy of Godd

Posted by: SweetTRIX
Not in the least, but i'm not above being irritated by people that feel the need to ram their -blam!--blam!-ity down others throats.

I don't understand this kind of logic. Sure, it's good that you're fine with people being -blam!-, but if you don't think they can't express themselves for who they are, can you really say you support it?

I don't remember saying I support homo-blam!-ity, I simply stated that i'm not homophobic. There is quite the difference between the two.

Do you also get upset when women dress seductively or when guys work out a bunch and wear clothes to accentuate their physique? Those types of expression are deemed socially acceptable, and you probably don't even notice it. If you think being flamboyant is annoying, then you clearly don't think that being flamboyant is acceptable.
I get annoyed by anyone that feels the need to beat people over the head with their lifestyle, because when it reaches that point it has nothing to do with their self expression and all to do with "pay attention to me".

  • 12.12.2012 9:53 AM PDT


Posted by: MyNameIsCharlie
By the way, the -blam!- community issued this ultimatum about same sex marriage.


Lolol.

  • 12.12.2012 9:54 AM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: Rokklaggio
The only homophobia I have is against those who like to show it all out in public and stuff. That's the worst way to try and support -blam!- marriage (ie, -blam!- Pride Parade)

Pride parades are more about "I'm okay with who I am even though I'm not treated as your equal" rather than "look how -blam!- I am!"

  • 12.12.2012 9:54 AM PDT

Studies show that men think about sex every 7 seconds. I do my best to eat hotdogs in under 6, just so things don't get weird.

Please allow me to introduce Myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste
I've been around for a long, long year
Stole many a man's soul and faith


Posted by: Rokklaggio
The only homophobia I have is against those who like to show it all out in public and stuff. That's the worst way to try and support -blam!- marriage (ie, -blam!- Pride Parade).

If you want for it to be legalized, then get it right. But no, I don't hate -blam!-s, just those who love to show it out in public, just like the bronies, furries, etc.
Not to pick on you, but why?

Should interracial couples not kiss too? How about mixed faith? I dunno, I don't see why one segment of the population should abstain from publicly showing affection to one another just because some people find it icky.

  • 12.12.2012 9:55 AM PDT

Now go make me some tea.


Posted by: Modern Designer
It's a disorder because it goes against the necessary qualification of life which is reproduction. Sure they have the absolute, but lack the drive, which is a neurological disorder. Pretty simple.[/quote]
Why does that make it a disorder? Even if it was a disorder, why should that stop them from having the rights of others?

Some people are born infertile. Should they not be allowed to marry? Others are born paralyzed making them unable to reproduce. Should they not be able to marry? What about the individuals who choose to not reproduce? Should they be unable to marry as well?[/quote]
Well infertile people still have the drive, but not the capability. They have a physical disorder but not a mental disorder. That criteria makes it okay for them to marry. Paralyzed people can to, but I don't see how that would work out well. As for the people who choose not to have kids, that's okay. [/quote]But -blam!--blam!-ity and bi-blam!-ity is not a mental disorder. Even if it was, we still let people with mental disorders marry. Why is this one different?[/quote]

Not that I have anything against -blam!-s, but if they're allowed to marry, then furries will want to, too. Then pedofiles, and raccoons will want to marry trashcans[/quote]Why can't furries get married? As long as they're consenting adults, it should be legal. As for the last two, they are not both legal, consenting adults, so they cannot marry.

Are you seriously defending furries?

  • 12.12.2012 9:55 AM PDT

<3

Why would I be scared of some weak little -blam!-.

Just kidding homos don't get so butthurt.

cwhatididthar

  • 12.12.2012 9:55 AM PDT

Artes, Scientia, Veritas

Sapere Aude

"But I do not think we're invincible"


Posted by: Rokklaggio
The only homophobia I have is against those who like to show it all out in public and stuff.
But I'm sure it's perfectly fine when straight people make public displays of affection, right?.That's the worst way to try and support -blam!- marriage (ie, -blam!- Pride Parade). You don't understand the point of pride parades.

But no, I don't hate -blam!-s, just those who love to show it out in public, just like the bronies, furries, etc.Why? What's wrong with "showing it in public" when other people with relationships of which society approves are more than welcome to?

  • 12.12.2012 9:55 AM PDT

“If we will disbelieve everything, because we cannot certainly know all things, we shall do much what as wisely as he who would not use his legs, but sit still and perish, because he had no wings to fly.” - John Locke

"How can anyone be enlightened? Truth after all is so poorly lit." - Rush

Nope

  • 12.12.2012 9:55 AM PDT

Recon Number 54 -
If they are still looking, then while holding the snarl, I let drool start to drip from my mouth, I stand, curl my fingers into claws and with a hunched over crouch, I then make slow and deliberate steps towards them. When I get close enough, I let them hear my agonized and gasping growls and then, if they continue to stare, when I get within arm's reach? I kiss them on the nose, and run away giggling.

Very rarely does anyone ever just say something and it clicks.

But a Floodian posted to the effect of

'Nothing anyone or anything does is unnatural, Humans do not exist in a vacuumed bubble outside of nature to judge what is right and wrong.'

This seems quite apt.

Also, who cares what other people do? As long as people don't get in your face about it they can do what they like.

  • 12.12.2012 9:56 AM PDT

ooga booga boooh

i doesn't afraid of anything not even men and women

  • 12.12.2012 9:56 AM PDT

My Brahman is ready.


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: Rokklaggio
The only homophobia I have is against those who like to show it all out in public and stuff. That's the worst way to try and support -blam!- marriage (ie, -blam!- Pride Parade)

Pride parades are more about "I'm okay with who I am even though I'm not treated as your equal" rather than "look how -blam!- I am!"


It's still an attention-seeking thing. They're showing it all out in public like it's the last day on Earth. I don't care what your orientation is, if you feel like reminding me every year that you're something, then you need to do something else.

  • 12.12.2012 9:57 AM PDT

Please do not send me group invites.


Posted by: TheDerRitter

Posted by: MadMax888
Why can't furries get married? As long as they're consenting adults, it should be legal. As for the last two, they are not both legal, consenting adults, so they cannot marry.

Are you seriously defending furries?

Yes. Why should they be denied rights that other people have based on such a trivial element?

  • 12.12.2012 9:58 AM PDT

Now go make me some tea.


Posted by: Rokklaggio

Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: Rokklaggio
The only homophobia I have is against those who like to show it all out in public and stuff. That's the worst way to try and support -blam!- marriage (ie, -blam!- Pride Parade)

Pride parades are more about "I'm okay with who I am even though I'm not treated as your equal" rather than "look how -blam!- I am!"


It's still an attention-seeking thing. They're showing it all out in public like it's the last day on Earth. I don't care what your orientation is, if you feel like reminding me every year that you're something, then you need to do something else.


Check your priveledge CIS scum


Posted by: MadMax888

Posted by: TheDerRitter

Posted by: MadMax888
Why can't furries get married? As long as they're consenting adults, it should be legal. As for the last two, they are not both legal, consenting adults, so they cannot marry.

Are you seriously defending furries?

Yes. Why should they be denied rights that other people have based on such a trivial element?

Because that trivial element is the need to bone animals.

[Edited on 12.12.2012 9:59 AM PST]

  • 12.12.2012 9:58 AM PDT