- MadMax888
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
Please do not send me group invites.
Posted by: TheDerRitter
Posted by: MadMax888
Posted by: Modern Designer
Posted by: ABotelho
Posted by: Modern Designer
It's a disorder because it goes against the necessary qualification of life which is reproduction. Sure they have the absolute, but lack the drive, which is a neurological disorder. Pretty simple.
Why does that make it a disorder? Even if it was a disorder, why should that stop them from having the rights of others?
Some people are born infertile. Should they not be allowed to marry? Others are born paralyzed making them unable to reproduce. Should they not be able to marry? What about the individuals who choose to not reproduce? Should they be unable to marry as well?
Well infertile people still have the drive, but not the capability. They have a physical disorder but not a mental disorder. That criteria makes it okay for them to marry. Paralyzed people can to, but I don't see how that would work out well. As for the people who choose not to have kids, that's okay. But -blam!--blam!-ity and bi-blam!-ity is not a mental disorder. Even if it was, we still let people with mental disorders marry. Why is this one different?
Not that I have anything against -blam!-s, but if they're allowed to marry, then furries will want to, too. Then pedofiles, and raccoons will want to marry trashcansWhy can't furries get married? As long as they're consenting adults, it should be legal. As for the last two, they are not both legal, consenting adults, so they cannot marry.