Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Star Wars vs. Star Trek
  • Subject: Star Wars vs. Star Trek
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Star Wars vs. Star Trek
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: TehWarMoose

Posted by: And Im Here Too
In a fight? Star Trek, even without the Q.

I would go into a long rant about the Empire and their seemingly endless supply of increasingly grandiose superweapons, but I think you've probably already heard it.

OT: Star Wars, without a doubt. Mando'ade > Klingons.

Of course, Q could probably just go "nope" and then wipe out the entire empire because he felt like it.

  • 12.13.2012 5:54 AM PDT

_____ ____(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
--------____.`=====.-.~:_______\___|==============[oo
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)
Have Fai7h

My old Halo account: karsttheninja99

Why isn't there a poll?

  • 12.13.2012 6:00 AM PDT

RIP Logan ~B.B.

Hard to compare the two, since Star Trek has thousands of more hours of official canon content. Star Wars is one saga compared to Star Trek's thousands of short stories. Both had quality, iconic actors (at least if you pretend the prequels don't exist). Both had pretty sweet universes with a lot of depth for spin-offs. Star Wars obviously had the grand cinematography and special effects budget, while Star Trek had more depth and variety of story. IMO, they both do what they set out to do well.

  • 12.13.2012 6:12 AM PDT

RIP Logan ~B.B.


Posted by: And Im Here Too
In a fight? Star Trek, even without the Q.

No Q? Blasphemy. You're lucky I don't cast you out, or smite you, or something.

[Edited on 12.13.2012 6:18 AM PST]

  • 12.13.2012 6:18 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2