- ROBERTO jh
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
So today has barely begun and you're saying this means Halo's dead?
As someone said, this is the post-rose tinted weeks where everyone realizes the hyped game isn't Jesus. Mix this with the base fact that Halo has actual competition nowadays--which Halo 3 never had--and you simply get the inevitable.
Halo isn't dead, it just peaked at Halo 3. No need to be melodramatic about it.
Posted by: Powershadows
Posted by: X18
Posted by: EChondo
If it's not broke, don't fix it.
They obviously don't know the golden rule. EA/Dice broke this rule and now look at BF3, Bioware broke this rule and now look at Mass Effect 3(well what happened).
Now look at Activision, keeping the same formula as usual and raking in millions of millions of dollars every year from the Call of Duty franchise.
Look how Bungie went off from the beaten path on Reach, it came and went and now look at 343i doing the same thing, now Halo 4 is just crap, but still feels like Halo, and needs a TU to be playable.
this ^^
^This.
Spoken like three people who know nothing about the competitive market. Call of Duty doesn't have to change because it is the leading example. It's the exception to the rule. Halo, on the other hand, is no longer top of the class anymore, and in order for it to survive in the changing market, it has to adapt or die.
Darwinism applies to more things than biology. Survival of the fittest is a universal rule in any competitive environment. Halo isn't the fittest anymore, so it needs to adapt. It can't afford to be stuck in the past.
[Edited on 12.13.2012 4:23 AM PST]