Original Account-Sargeantomeg4-Intrepid Mythic Member-01/06/08 to 02/29/12
Posted by: lightlamp2
Posted by: Sergeant omega
Posted by: lightlamp2
Even if he used a handgun is there any justification for needing an assault rifle over a handgun?AR-15 with frangible ammunition is one of the best home defense weapons there is.So it would make it easier to defend yourself and shoot a guy with an assault rifle than it would with a handgun? Assasult rifles are much better at inflicting mass casualties than handguns do.Also, what you are talking about aren't assault rifles.
And I'm not even going to go into how most gun related homicides are both committed with cheap, disposable handguns along with the fact that most homicide is criminal on criminal and black on black.
Posted by: A Deaf Boy
Holy -blam!-. At first it was no fatalities and just 3 wounded. Now it's 20 dead and 10 of them children.
Damn it. You can -blam!- about gun laws all you want, but while guns don't kill people, it makes it a hell of a lot easier to. And that ain't right.The worst school massacre was committed with bomb in the 1930s.
[Edited on 12.14.2012 10:11 AM PST]