Posted by: Officer Nasty16
Posted by: MeltingBrainbob
Posted by: Officer Nasty16
OP, you do realize the shooter was aware that the school was a "gun-free zone," right? If there weren't gun restrictions already, maybe schools could have halfway decent security guards who could actually defend themselves in a scenario like that.
I'm sorry? Your school has armed police patrolling the corridors? Buddy, not everybody has as luxurious schools as you.
Sorry, "buddy," but you missed my point. Not once in what I said did I show that I go to a school with armed police. If you have ever been to any school, you would know that they are gun free, and have been for over 20 years. You jumping to conclusions like this show me you really have no idea what you're talking about, and because of that.
Don't feed the troll, people.
You'd be one hungry person if we stopped feeding you. I think it's funny how you made a bunch of assumptions. You're like 13. At least you act like one.
Posted by: Officer Nasty16
You didn't put a comma before that fragment. Obviously you are mentally incapable of arguing with me, and have no life.
-_-
Read your first quote:
Posted by: Officer Nasty16
OP, you do realize the shooter was aware that the school was a "gun-free zone," right? If there weren't gun restrictions already, maybe schools could have halfway decent security guards who could actually defend themselves in a scenario like that.
Ok. I'll give you one thing. I assumed that you had security guards in your school. That was phrased incorrectly. I assumed that when you said, "Schools should have security guards" that you had guards in your school yourself, that's why you were saying it. But it wasn't. You were suggesting that.
However, the thing is, it would cost a lot of money to put a decent amount of police in a school. It would also make the students uneasy. What you just said was just simply a terrible idea. No guns, no shooters. No need for police, better work environment.