- CrazzySnipe55
- |
- Fabled Legendary Member
Posted by: Forever MS
Posted by: Palien90
Posted by: Forever MS
Posted by: Raptorx7
Cry more, a movie doesn't need to be non stop action especially one that is more about the journey than anything else.
I hate how movies have to be non stop violence and explosions to be successful.
Nice, flame me for having a different opinion and then make awful assumptions.
The original trilogy wasn't filled with just non-stop action, and in fact the movies were longer than this Hobbit movie, but they were much more interesting, and better paced.
The new film is right around the same length as fellowship.
Yes, and during Fellowship I was not bored once, despite it being a similar length.
It was a tight, concise, and excellently paced story.
The Hobbit Part one is a bloated, uninteresting, and most of all boring filmBut it's a big part of the story. Necromancers are not mentioned at all in The Hobbit (IIRC), and they're clearly going to be part of the story in the latter half.