Posted by: Garland
Posted by: elsnben
Posted by: ArchNinja64
Posted by: Double A
Posted by: ArchNinja64
Disagree. People are the problem, not guns.
Read the post kid.
Kid? LOL
I did. You said the same thing and then said AR's should be banned. Your logic doesnt make sense.
Givw me a reason why you would need an operational assualt rifle. It's bad for hunting, and you don't need that sort of gun for protection, thats what he's trying to say.The people that go through the amount of licencing and huge costs involved with buy an assault rifle or other fully automatic firearm are serious enthusiasts and collectors.
Such weapons have been used in two single homocides in the past 75 years. There is no logical reason to ban them. Saying "you don't need one" is a terrible reason, and could be used to ban anything that isn't basic food, water, shelter, and clothing.
Why do the the collectors need one that works?, all I'm saying is that banning weapons like assault rifles, SMG's and high caliber sniper rifles that are all operational isn't going to cause much of a problem, as the ones that want ones that are active, most likely want them for maliscious reasons.
just to clarify I'm mean banning active ones, I live in the UK and I'm allowed to own any gun that has been deativated.