- Delta SWE
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: alex0612
Posted by: ninjakenzen
Posted by: alex0612
Posted by: CharlesBrown33
Posted by: Lazy bazooka
Hot topic incoming, the fire rises.
Also, of course 343 took it more seriously. It was their first game and they had a lot of pressure on them to make a good game. Treyarch didn't need to take it seriously at all, since the game would make billions anyway.
Anyway?
Different from Halo 4, Black Ops 2 didn't come broken and full of glitches.Halo 2 was like that when it first shipped, but you don't see people remembering that. Jump off the hate bandwagon and come back to reality.
Halo 2 is a terrible example due to the fact that it is a 8 year old game and was introduced when xbox live was at it's infancy [Notice I don't mean it's the first xbox live game], online console gaming hadn't progressed till that point. Plus most of the glitches were actually fun [subjective] and were reasonable considering how ambitious the project was. Although Halo 4 isn't a glitchfest it's still is a terrible Halo game. [Subjective]
Lol hate bandwagon. try actually thinking about why Halo 2 was the game it was. That's a good example of using Halo 2 as a self-reflection for you not practicing what you preach.Yeah it is a great example, a great example at how nostalgia completely clouds people's minds. Halo 2 was broken and glitchy. Superjump to abuse the maps, messed up melee system, one weapons sandbox, ect... Plus the title updates for that game were like....... never. People still continue to praise Halo 2 as if it was some god, but in reality, it's not all that good. And don't even get me started with Halo 2's trash campaign.I liked Halo 2's story more then any other game. The story was great and no oversimplified like the others. But the ending could have been better and all those other problems are due to the time restraints with Microsoft. Bungie thought they had more time then they had and the result was a rushed game with a cut story.