Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Could North Korea defeat South Korea ALONE?
  • Subject: Could North Korea defeat South Korea ALONE?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Could North Korea defeat South Korea ALONE?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

We oG now.

The GOAT:

Posted by: AK FROST
Who cares if I lie?

North Korea would nuke South Korea.

The United States would proceed to wipe North Korea off the planet.

The US would win.

  • 12.18.2012 6:29 AM PDT


Posted by: Puma Knight
The scary thing is that if North Korea does invade South Korea, they basically just started World War III. America will step in and defend South Korea, but because the US interfered then Russia will take North Korea's side and so will China. Then it is basically the US and South Korea against North Korea, China and Russia. The UK may try to back us, but they just dismantlement their navy basically because the US has one, so they don't need one. The rest of our possible allies don't have armed forces to compare to us or the big communist countries.


It doesn't work that way.

a) Russia isn't Communist anymore.
b) They hate China.
c) If there was a WWIII They would sit it out or even side with the US. There is NO way they would side with China.

  • 12.18.2012 6:33 AM PDT

I am a pharmaceutical scientist. I received my Masters degree in Pharmaceutics from the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia in 2010, after working as a Pharmacist for 4 years. I currently work in King of Prussia, PA, and focus on the analytical chemistry of small molecule APIs. My clients include some of the most well known big pharma companies in the world.


Posted by: Gamer Whale

Posted by: Dback139
On an offensive side for NK, there only real capability from an air attack would be to hit Seoul, which would be devastating because of the massive civilian presence. There are also reports of literally hundreds, if not thousands, of underground tunnels that NK has allegedly been building for years which lead in to SK territory, so there is the fear of a preemptive attack, although it is only likely that this would happen if combat were already occurring. Think underground guerrilla warfare.
NKs don't need airstrikes to raze Seoul, they have hundreds, if not thousands of artillery emplacements that can hit Seoul.

And anyone who thinks China or Russia would back NK is an idiot IMO.
I'm implying that artillery has to be launched, hence an air strike from miles away. NK doesn't have the planes to engage in full on air raids.

  • 12.18.2012 6:36 AM PDT

Am I supposed to write something funny here?


Posted by: Dback139
I'm implying that artillery has to be launched, hence an air strike from miles away. NK doesn't have the planes to engage in full on air raids.
"Artillery has to be launched"? Were not talking about missiles or airstrikes here, but old-school cannons. Thousands of cannons.

And to people who say NK will nuke SK, we don't know if they have nukes that are small enough to be delivered efficiently, and I doubt it.

[Edited on 12.18.2012 6:41 AM PST]

  • 12.18.2012 6:41 AM PDT

Do everyone a favor, get some intelligence, grow a set, bust a nut, and shut the fu­ck up.
Posted by: Anto91
you're retared for not knowing inside jokes
retard


Posted by: mojeda101

Posted by: LordOfBlah51
North Korea has a basically unlimited supply of [cardboard] missiles!

So nope. SK would win.
They made it 2/5 times they tried to get into space. That beats our record and that of the Soviet Union by far when they started their ballistic missile programs.


But they are using borrowed tech and plans, not designing it from the ground up.

  • 12.18.2012 7:02 AM PDT

Do everyone a favor, get some intelligence, grow a set, bust a nut, and shut the fu­ck up.
Posted by: Anto91
you're retared for not knowing inside jokes
retard


Posted by: Gamer Whale

Posted by: Dback139
I'm implying that artillery has to be launched, hence an air strike from miles away. NK doesn't have the planes to engage in full on air raids.
"Artillery has to be launched"? Were not talking about missiles or airstrikes here, but old-school cannons. Thousands of cannons.

And to people who say NK will nuke SK, we don't know if they have nukes that are small enough to be delivered efficiently, and I doubt it.


Cannon+nuke

  • 12.18.2012 7:02 AM PDT

Rustled Jimmies


Posted by: Bookshelf
North Korea would nuke South Korea.

The United States would proceed to wipe North Korea off the planet.

The US would win.


even if they had a nuke SK would still win. The U.S. may step in but SK will be fine

  • 12.18.2012 7:46 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Millions of civilian casualties (the Norks already have artillery dialed in on Seoul), but the RoK will win hands-down. The rate of serviceability for North Korean equipment is absolutely horrific. They have up to forty modern fighters (comparable to an older F-16), and a massive amount of hardware that was old during Viet Nam.

Their SAM network is horrifically ancient, and is pretty much HARM fodder for KF-16s. Additionally, the RoKAF can use its superior precision-strike capability to hit various targets inside North Korea. The Norks tend to use underground facilities (trust me on this one; I've done analyses of every airbase in the DPRK). What happens when you hit the entrances of said facility with a two-thousand-pound JDAM?

It doesn't end well for the commies.

  • 12.18.2012 1:00 PM PDT

Posted by: Duardo
Not really. Your mom is over quite enough to make my fears mute.
Posted by: colbyrules8
Posted by: Duardo
Being alone.
You're a mod, you should be used to that.


Posted by: mojeda101

Posted by: LordOfBlah51
North Korea has a basically unlimited supply of [cardboard] missiles!

So nope. SK would win.
They made it 2/5 times they tried to get into space. That beats our record and that of the Soviet Union by far when they started their ballistic missile programs.


Posted by: Spartan Master 1

Posted by: Puma Knight
The scary thing is that if North Korea does invade South Korea, they basically just started World War III. America will step in and defend South Korea, but because the US interfered then Russia will take North Korea's side and so will China. Then it is basically the US and South Korea against North Korea, China and Russia. The UK may try to back us, but they just dismantlement their navy basically because the US has one, so they don't need one. The rest of our possible allies don't have armed forces to compare to us or the big communist countries.


Are you saying Russia is communist?
I think he's implying China.
Yeah, but it's 2012........

  • 12.18.2012 1:02 PM PDT

On the Left

Godshatter: I can go all the way with someone without being attracted to them.
CamCamm: How does that work?
Godshatter: I'm easily aroused by anything that moves. It's a curse.
Brain says 'No, that's ugly', body says 'ugly is fine with me'.

Once NK crosses into SK, all the N.Koreans will become S.Korean and never look back. South Korea will become Best Korea.

  • 12.18.2012 1:03 PM PDT

Check out my youtube channel. http://www.youtube.com/user/ultratog1028

No. Though in a situation, they'd have gotten help from another country before they attempted it

  • 12.18.2012 1:06 PM PDT

South owns North back to the Stone Age.


Oh wait...

  • 12.18.2012 1:08 PM PDT

Roll tide

Posted by: darthnazgul
Posted by: Mike_Bson
Posted by: darthnazgul
See the rapist.
I don't like rap.

*facepalm*

Guys.

If the first Korean War didn't turn into World War III what makes you think a second Korean War will be different?

  • 12.18.2012 1:08 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2