Posted by: foreveraloner35
Posted by: BuzzKill9009
Posted by: foreveraloner35
Posted by: edableshoe
Posted by: foreveraloner35
1. Reaction plays a crucial role. In Halo any old player can come back to a guy because it takes a mag to kill someone.Um, BR fights bro. If you don't react to the way someone is strafing, you'll miss and lose the fight
2. Quick scoping. It takes skill to do and avoid.
Halo has QS too bro, but I'd say NS is even more skillful because you don't get aim assist when the target is really far away.
5. In halo anyone ca get a but in COD people spawn with it so you need to avoid them What? Dude, you just said they are the same thing, but one is different than the other? I mean, if I can spawn with it in COD, that means ANYONE can get a . If anything, Halo is better in this respect because you have to earn the Rockets first.
It takes skill to spawn at high levels with RPGs in Halo level 1s get rockets and quick scoping is rare so doesn't need to be voided
except in Halo people dont spawn with rocket launchers, in COD you can. In Halo, you have to fight for the right to get that , in Cod you dont need to worry about it and you can spam rockets
But you need to get to the level with rockets so it shows skill
So? doesnt mean -blam!- when you cant get a kill from it. Your argument is that "just because i have more skill (and a better gun) means I'm better" logic. I fight someone with a higher level and beat him. If your logic was correct then whoever had the higher rank would automatically win