- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: ErranInfigo
Posted by: Forever MS
Posted by: ErranInfigo
Posted by: Forever MS
I agree. Overlong, boring, too much CGI, annoying characters, nowhere near as good as the original trilogy, made exclusively to milk a franchise...
What difference is there between this and the Phantom Menace?
1. The Hobbit existed before LOTR.
2. The Hobbit is written in a less serious way, with a less serious tone, than the LOTR Trilogy, hence why it seems more childish.
Doesn't excuse it from being: Overlong, boring, too much CGI, annoying characters, and made as a cheap cash grab
Please, they fit the first 100 or so pages into 1 movie, the details are pretty accurate, with exception being the Pale Orc and the Rock Giant scene. If you don't like the characters, than don't bother reading the actual book; they exist there too.
And why did they only put 100 pages into one full length movie? Cash grab.