- Garshne
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
- gamertag: [none]
- user homepage:
Posted by: Qbix89
Talking about Sweden is an ultrabannable offense.
Posted by: Achronos
Too bad being completely and utterly wrong isn't a bannable offense.
Posted by: omg a bannana
Posted by: Garshne
Posted by: omg a bannana
Posted by: Garshne
Better controls, smoother gameplay, long-range combat, vehicles, it looks better, it sounds better, you have feet, better gunplay.
Of course it's got balancing issues, some of the maps are -blam!-, some of the maps are overused, hardly any official servers anymore, and junk like that.
But it's still more fun.
Honestly, -blam!- No Luca No is better than CoD.
For the record, I play the -blam!- out of Arma 2.Better controls? They're the exact same other than prone and knife
Argument lost credibility detected.Button mapping is not what I was talking about, Bnan. You move somewhat like a real person in BF3, in CoD you do not.
But feel free to ignore everything I say. You've done that a lot over the last -blam!- two years, so I'm not surprised.
What CoD has done best: CoD has had much better storylines than any Battlefield game, embraces the 'SUPER ACTION SPECIAL FORCES -blam!- YEAH' theme and plays it well, and has simple mechanics that anyone can get into. If you want to pick up a game and play without any sort of needless dicking around, CoD is good.So what you're saying is that Call of Duty has unrealistic walking(which it doesn't) so Battlefield is better.
mmmkayWell obviously you're not reading anything I'm posting.
Good god, how could I have ever been friends with you.
DICE learnt a lot about player movement from Mirror's Edge and they did well incorporating those features into BF3.
[Edited on 12.21.2012 7:28 AM PST]