- TH3_AV3NG3R
- |
- Fabled Mythic Member
Posted by: x Foman123 x
Posted by: TH3_AV3NG3R
What house has a rocket pod, has legs, and has a long narrow barrel that probably shoots something powerful?
Sounds like you're describing the lower half of my body, actually.
Posted by: Dark Hunter 2100
Posted by: TH3_AV3NG3R
Posted by: Dark Hunter 2100
ITT people pick at Halo 2's auto aim, meanwhile Reach and 4 have the same relative auto aim and MANY more noobified/CODified features, worse maps, and game-ruining mechanics.
Reach didn't have the amount of auto aim as Halo 2's stop saying that already. I am not sure about Halo 4.
Reach had significant auto-aim along with a pleasant helping of Bloom. Auto-aim in 4 is the same as Reach, but the melee lunge was nerfed a little. Unfortunately, auto-aim is really the least of Halo 4's problems.
I didn't say it had no significant auto-aim and bloom did not help with anything but frustrate the player. In fact bloom was just a stupid attempt at trying to fix how you want your shots. Random or not since spread made things random and you had no control over that.
Anyways, I am saying it still isn't the same as Halo 2's. Any part of the reticule has to be on the player in order to get the kill while in Halo 2 it didn't.