- Cheeseoid
- |
- Honorable Member
Posted by: nightspark
Posted by: Oh GodLike One
Posted by: Mythical Wolf
OT: Reach is not the worst Halo game. Halo 4 is. There is nothing in it that makes me want to play it over and over. The custom game options are unbelievably bad.
Guess your opinion goes against the majority.
In a democracy that means you lose.
But lets check that again;
- Halo 4 at position #2,
- Reach down at #16
There is no other word for reach than disappointment.
- Reach released Sep 2010, December 2 years on, down to #16.
- Halo 3 released Sep 2007, December 2 years on #2.
If you want to compare it to Halo 4 ... yep, reach had fallen further than H4 by this equivalent point in time (even though it sold MANY more initial units).
lolreach.
You can't use a two year time frame because Halo was on a three year release schedule (flagship titles). Of course Halo would maintain a high spot in 2009. It had no competition form other flagship Halo titles. Halo 3 fell to 9th place in Dec. 2010, three months after Reach was released. There isn't any data on how Reach was doing a month after release. The LIVE metrics you linked for Halo 4 aren't even a month old (H4 was released Nov. 6th). Post Feb. 2013 metrics and we'll see if Halo 4 is doing better than Reach.
Why does population make a game good? Tell me this, because this is what it looks like these two posts are trying to say.
OT: 4 is NOT good for it's multiplayer, but the Campaign isn't that bad, the first four missions being fantastic. The forge and customs are a letdown in comparison to Reach, but they were hardly mind blowing in Reach anyway.
4>Reach