Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Al Jazeera reporting Chemical weapons used in Syria
  • Subject: Al Jazeera reporting Chemical weapons used in Syria
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4

What? Now the rebels have chemical weapons too? Where the hell did they get those?

  • 12.24.2012 12:15 AM PDT

Studies show that men think about sex every 7 seconds. I do my best to eat hotdogs in under 6, just so things don't get weird.

Please allow me to introduce Myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste
I've been around for a long, long year
Stole many a man's soul and faith

If any of these reports are true, they constitute war crimes, which will force NATO to intervene. If the blue helmets go in, there will be US involvement.

Whichever way this pans out, it's not good.

  • 12.24.2012 12:18 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

It's horrible if Syria uses chemical weapons but if Isreal uses them then it's ok?

  • 12.24.2012 8:49 AM PDT

Studies show that men think about sex every 7 seconds. I do my best to eat hotdogs in under 6, just so things don't get weird.

Please allow me to introduce Myself
I'm a man of wealth and taste
I've been around for a long, long year
Stole many a man's soul and faith


Posted by: Pongee Opressee
It's horrible if Syria uses chemical weapons but if Isreal uses them then it's ok?
i beg your pardon? I don't recall Israel ever doing that. Methinks you are trying to make stuff up.

  • 12.24.2012 8:50 AM PDT
Subject: Al Jazerra reporting Chemical weapons used in Syria

I am not surprised, these weapons may be from Iraq during Saddam's reign.

  • 12.24.2012 8:51 AM PDT
Subject: Al Jazeera reporting Chemical weapons used in Syria
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I don't really give a -blam!- about the weapons used, it's just that no we're going to risk our own lives. Dammit.

  • 12.24.2012 8:54 AM PDT
Subject: Al Jazeera reporting Chemical weapons used in Syria


Posted by: MilitaryTheorist
Al-Jazeera also report a few weeks ago that Iran was giving up their nuclear weapons program. Until I hear something from a larger, more reputable news agency, I won't take as the truth.


As of this point the USA is completely in the knowledge that Iran is not building nuclear weapons just yet, they just think they will sometime in the near future.

  • 12.24.2012 9:03 AM PDT


Posted by: Pongee Opressee
It's horrible if Syria uses chemical weapons but if Isreal uses them then it's ok?


No you see $10 000 American made laser guided missiles fired on residential districts is completely fine.

  • 12.24.2012 9:05 AM PDT


Posted by: Pongee Opressee
It's horrible if Syria uses chemical weapons but if Isreal uses them then it's ok?

Savage...? That would explain the stupid...
OT: If true this is not good news. Things are gonna go downhill fast.

  • 12.24.2012 9:08 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: pegboy2k12
No we should actually help Assad. Non-revolutionary Muslim government is better.


FTFY

  • 12.24.2012 9:12 AM PDT


Posted by: pegboy2k12
No we should actually help Assad. Stable government is better


You DO realise we only helped Libya because we want money right? Gaddafi was our friend until we realised we could gain from his country.

  • 12.24.2012 9:17 AM PDT


Posted by: MyNameIsCharlie
If any of these reports are true, they constitute war crimes, which will force NATO to intervene. If the blue helmets go in, there will be US involvement.

Whichever way this pans out, it's not good.


Haha going in because of war crimes is never definite and only applies if we want it to. Israel has been convicted of war crimes one hell of a lot but we don't do anything because they're our buddy.

  • 12.24.2012 9:18 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: NinjaLord77

Posted by: Telomee
Posted by: NinjaLord77
They're gonna start spraying from the sky and then we will have a huge problem.


That's actually a terrible way to deploy a chemical weapon, too much dispersion due to atmospherics. You want to concentrate the agent on whatever target you're hitting so you have enough to kill people. That's why they're delivered in rockets, bombs, or tube artillery shells.


So my way means less deaths. Let's do that, or better yet let's not use them at all anymore.
You are ignorant on how this works.

  • 12.24.2012 9:26 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: MyNameIsCharlie

Posted by: Pongee Opressee
It's horrible if Syria uses chemical weapons but if Isreal uses them then it's ok?
i beg your pardon? I don't recall Israel ever doing that. Methinks you are trying to make stuff up.
white pospherous or whatever it's called is a chemical weapon

  • 12.24.2012 10:13 AM PDT

Please stop complaining about the 'death of a loved one' it's my job. They probably deserved it anyways. Here's a warning, if you keep making pentagrams out of the neighbors livestock I will personally come to your house and kill everyone you love. Now leave me alone, I got to get back to work.
~M.D~

Do any of you know chemical Ali? Killed villages with chemicals and acids. It's like being burned alive, torture really.

  • 12.24.2012 10:22 AM PDT

"I will show you how a true Prussian officer fights!"

"And i will show you where the iron crosses grow..."

- "Cross of Iron"


Posted by: Binman59

Posted by: pegboy2k12
No we should actually help Assad. Stable government is better


You DO realise we only helped Libya because we want money right? Gaddafi was our friend until we realised we could gain from his country.


Yes we only helped Libya because of money. ALL OF NATO DID IT ONLY FOR MONEY.

Where the hell do you guys come up with this stuff?

  • 12.24.2012 10:44 AM PDT

I acknowledge my user name is stupid. However, I promise I'm not.

Disclaimer: The latter is a lie.

I hope not...

sadface.jpeg

  • 12.24.2012 10:48 AM PDT


Posted by: Raptorx7

Posted by: Binman59

Posted by: pegboy2k12
No we should actually help Assad. Stable government is better


You DO realise we only helped Libya because we want money right? Gaddafi was our friend until we realised we could gain from his country.


Yes we only helped Libya because of money. ALL OF NATO DID IT ONLY FOR MONEY.

Where the hell do you guys come up with this stuff?


Oh because you guys went to Iraq just to kill a "dictator" and then promptly left?

Also, Libya used to have the highest Living rate in Middle east/North Africa, now the rebals want to impose sharia law.

  • 12.24.2012 10:51 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4