Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Poll [59 votes]: Halo 2 Scarab vs. AT - AT
  • Poll [59 votes]: Halo 2 Scarab vs. AT - AT
Subject: Halo 2 Scarab vs. AT - AT

"Through the fog the army moves on. Pushing through borders. Knocking over obstacles. Killing all enemies. Victory is secured, brothers, march on until the flag rises over the landscape."
The Holy Council

Poll: Halo 2 Scarab vs. AT - AT  [closed]
Scarab:  80%
(47 Votes)
AT - AT:  20%
(12 Votes)
Total Votes: 59

What would win in an open field?

  • 12.24.2012 6:41 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I use a signature because I can

WWII Russia

  • 12.24.2012 6:42 AM PDT

Scarab

  • 12.24.2012 6:42 AM PDT

Dumb people are just blissfully unaware of how very dumb they are.

The Scarab easily. It's legs are positioned more structurally and has way more weapons.

  • 12.24.2012 6:43 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Scarabs can be dropped from orbit, and also have the unique ability of being able to turn and move quickly.

  • 12.24.2012 6:45 AM PDT

AT- AT are mainly used for transport. Although over range they would have the accuracy advantage over the scarab.

  • 12.24.2012 6:59 AM PDT

Beard.

  • 12.24.2012 7:04 AM PDT


Posted by: Oh so Lag
WWII Russia

  • 12.24.2012 7:30 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Halo 2 isn't dead jorge...... its just missing in action.
MnF Elite Force <>Brigadier<>

Brown coat 'till the day I die.
Sheningans!
Wake me...when you need me.

Scarab. By far.

  • 12.24.2012 7:33 AM PDT

Join the Halo Haven group!

The AT-AT can carry a LOT of troops, and its armour is incredibly thick, so it would stand a fair chance, i think the scarab would probably win, but the troops dropped from the AT-AT would be able to take down the scarab, and thus there would be stalemate.

  • 12.24.2012 7:43 AM PDT
  • gamertag: AJ7188
  • user homepage:

Scarab is much more powerful.

  • 12.24.2012 7:43 AM PDT

Better pissed off then pissed on

WWII russia

  • 12.24.2012 7:43 AM PDT

What are these first person words you speak of?

Halo 3's ODST Scarab duo.

[Edited on 12.24.2012 7:46 AM PST]

  • 12.24.2012 7:46 AM PDT

AT-AT by far, those cannons...

Not to mention having a range advantage.

If a little rocket launcher can take out a scarabs legs an AT-AT could blow them to smithereens.

[Edited on 12.24.2012 7:48 AM PST]

  • 12.24.2012 7:48 AM PDT

What doesn't kill you, only makes you stranger

Drop the Scarab on the AT-AT from orbit.

Victory!

  • 12.24.2012 7:49 AM PDT

Posted by: AngryBrute1
Oh yeah, since somebody does not believe what YOU believe; that makes us vapid...
I cannot grasp that what you call "Something happened to nothing, and that nothing became something, and it was smaller than than a period."

Scarab. They can move faster, and if it was a Halo 2 version Scarab, has a super powerful laser-cannon weapon that can blast through bridges and tanks.

  • 12.24.2012 7:58 AM PDT


Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
Scarab. They can move faster, and if it was a Halo 2 version Scarab, has a super powerful laser-cannon weapon that can blast through bridges and tanks.


AT-AT are faster than they appear, they just don't have the same turning ability.

  • 12.24.2012 8:03 AM PDT

RIP - The Rev: February 9, 1981 – December 28, 2009
RIP - Mitch Lucker: October 20, 1984 - November 1, 2012
RIP - Dimebag Darrell: August 20, 1966 – December 8, 2004
RIP - Ronny James Dio: July 10, 1942 - May 16, 2010

Halo 2 Scarab. That bastard was so damn deadly, and going inside to kill its pilot and engine was the only way to kill it.

  • 12.24.2012 8:03 AM PDT

-Bungie All Star Nameplate Winner
-Forgehub: Hub of the Dead III Winner
-Custom Games host for TheHaloForgeEpidemic
-Halotracks: ex staff

"In peace the sons bury their fathers, but in war the fathers bury their sons." -Croesus

Halo 2 Scarab. Tank shells couldn't even stop it.

  • 12.24.2012 8:05 AM PDT

The Scarab......

  • 12.24.2012 8:18 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: gaurdianAQsclone
AT-AT by far, those cannons...

Not to mention having a range advantage.

If a little rocket launcher can take out a scarabs legs an AT-AT could blow them to smithereens.
That's the Halo 3 Scarab. We're talking about the Halo 2 Scarab.

  • 12.24.2012 8:22 AM PDT


Posted by: timothy pumpkin
The AT-AT can carry a LOT of troops, and its armour is incredibly thick, so it would stand a fair chance, i think the scarab would probably win, but the troops dropped from the AT-AT would be able to take down the scarab, and thus there would be stalemate.

I agree. Also, I thought the AT-AT can dropped from orbit. The AT-AT is also very accurate at long range also so the battleground is important.

  • 12.24.2012 8:22 AM PDT