- DecepticonCobra
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
@accordingto343
Your one stop shop for all of 343's fabulous errors and ridiculous notions in the Halo lore.
Posted by: ROBERTO jh
Posted by: DecepticonCobra
Posted by: ROBERTO jh
Artistic license applies to any visual changes. While the nanobot thing may explain the Chief's armor, ultimately it comes down to a different artistic vision for the character.
Valid points, perhaps I just don't care much for it because I don't care for how 343i treats artistic licensing in general. They've played a bit fast and loose with MJOLNIR before. With Forward Unto Dawn and the Fall of Reach comics, they no longer had MJOLNIR be the same armor amongst all the Spartans. Then they make it the same in the Prologue, but it is the Halo 4 armor.
Just frustrating you know?
I can understand the argument I suppose, but I don't agree with it simply because I can look at him and still tell he's the Chief. Artistic interpretaions of a character don't mean anything to the story, and effect absolutely no one, so I'm not bothered by them if I can still recognize them.
Well I'd say the inconsistency of the armor being the same is a bit of a concern, but at the end of the day I guess I'll just admit it is more of a personal preference.