- Xplode441
- |
- Exalted Legendary Member
Posted by: Great_Pretender
Case and point: don't worry about it. Girls start getting boobies pretty soon, and then you'll have plenty of other things to think about. Being an Inheritor is not a life goal.
-TGP-
Posted by: Seggi31
It wasn't an argument, it was a statement. Anyway, an invalid argument is one whose conclusions do not follow from its premises. The statements represented below:
Guns can kill people
Guns should be banned
Knives can kill people
Do not entail the conclusion that knives should be banned. Since the conclusion does not follow from the premises, an argument attempting to claim that it does is invalid. That's simply what it means for an argument to be invalid, and I'm not arguing that, I'm explaining it.You stated a position opposite of mine, am I not supposed to see that as argumentative?
Besides, the origin of this began as: "Owning guns is the equivalent of the right to take someone's life" AgentCOP1 explained that if that is true, then the potential and right to take someone's life is in all things that can be used as weapons.
Is he wrong? No one has attacked that statement, merely told him that he was using logical fallacies. I then pointed out that neither you or Dutchy has invalidated his argument by pointing out a simply fallacy.