Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: So 343i remove the Action Sack playlist from Reach
  • Subject: So 343i remove the Action Sack playlist from Reach
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: So 343i remove the Action Sack playlist from Reach
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I.....I don't know what to say. I can't decide if 343i is trying to tank themselves or what? It's a shock, I think I lost a peice of myself. Thanks 343i

  • 12.26.2012 11:05 AM PDT

lolReach

  • 12.26.2012 11:05 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Honorable Legendary Member
  • gamertag: Koolen
  • user homepage:

O o
/¯_____________________
| BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!
\_¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ;¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯

I loved how 343 screwed up Reach as soon as they took control over it.

  • 12.26.2012 11:05 AM PDT

Meepzoid

Too bad Halo 3's action sack was like 4000000.356 times better.

  • 12.26.2012 11:05 AM PDT

I'm glad you cared to look at this box with letters. Lets hang out sometime! :D

This isn't the Reach forum.

  • 12.26.2012 11:06 AM PDT

Proud member of the Herd


Posted by: Koolen
I loved how 343 screwed up Reach as soon as they took control over it.


I love that even if 343 never took over, the community still would not be satisfied with Reach.

  • 12.26.2012 11:08 AM PDT

Why are they even updating the reach playlists anymore? They already made it impossible to get the anniversary DLC achievements. Why bother?

  • 12.26.2012 11:08 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Honorable Heroic Member
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Your 'beliefs' mean less than dick to me.

Could've sworn this happened a long time ago.

  • 12.26.2012 11:08 AM PDT

Mythical Group

There is no greater catharsis than arguing on the Flood.

Posted by: Koolen
I loved how 343 screwed up Reach as soon as they took control over it.
They really did. They kinda left the playlists fallow for like 6 months before that "omg title update".

  • 12.26.2012 11:08 AM PDT

Yeah and they figured removing bloom on precision weapons but not on automatic ones was completely fine and wouldn't lead to even more DMR OPness

  • 12.26.2012 11:10 AM PDT

I acknowledge my user name is stupid. However, I promise I'm not.

Disclaimer: The latter is a lie.

That's just because Halo 3 was a far superior game, though.

:-)

Posted by: tha man
Too bad Halo 3's action sack was like 4000000.356 times better.

  • 12.26.2012 11:10 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

3rd edition. Now with more grunt.

TFS 4 lyfe

And it's not in Halo 3 anymore! Bungie, you suck!

  • 12.26.2012 11:11 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

This was done months ago before Halo 4 launched.

  • 12.26.2012 11:11 AM PDT

Why Bungie, why would you do this?! - Halo Community


Posted by: MrR46
Could've sworn this happened a long time ago.

  • 12.26.2012 11:12 AM PDT

I <3 Halo:Reach - amazingly fun and best campaign + amazing Soundtrack
I <3 Halo 3:ODST - best soundtrack + Firefight + Coastal Highway and Mombassa Streets, amazingly unique campaign.
I <3 Halo 3 - best multiplayer levels + Forge + best Custom Games + soundtrack
I <3 Halo 2 - amazing huge fun campaign + soundtrack + Fun multiplayer
I <3 Halo: CE - started it all

...They literally did this 5 or 6 months ago.

  • 12.26.2012 11:13 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Honorable Heroic Member
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Your 'beliefs' mean less than dick to me.

Posted by: Binman59
Yeah and they figured removing bloom on precision weapons but not on automatic ones was completely fine and wouldn't lead to even more DMR OPness

Alright, I'll say this one definitive time... anyone who defends the presence of bloom in a FPS is dumber than a box of rat turds and should be stripped of their right to an opinion.

  • 12.26.2012 11:15 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Swine of War464

Posted by: Koolen
I loved how 343 screwed up Reach as soon as they took control over it.


I love that even if 343 never took over, the community still would not be satisfied with Reach.

But they're in charge now so obviously we can forget who created the game and blame them for everything. We have to start the Bungie dick riding fest in anticipation for Destiny.

[Edited on 12.26.2012 11:18 AM PST]

  • 12.26.2012 11:17 AM PDT

They're trying to tank Reach so everyone goes to Halo 4. A real hit to the balls, but apparently it's working.

You know you can only have two player splitscreen in Reach now right?

[Edited on 12.26.2012 11:18 AM PST]

  • 12.26.2012 11:18 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Rabid Grunt 3
And it's not in Halo 3 anymore! Bungie, you suck!

Action Sack is still in halo 3.
Derp

  • 12.26.2012 11:22 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

3rd edition. Now with more grunt.

TFS 4 lyfe


Posted by: yodmarn7

Posted by: Rabid Grunt 3
And it's not in Halo 3 anymore! Bungie, you suck!

Action Sack is still in halo 3.
Derp


Only because 343. I love you 343!

  • 12.26.2012 11:23 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Intrepid Heroic Member
  • gamertag: KB0n3s
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Gaara444
You know you can only have two player splitscreen in Reach now right?

What? Are you sure about this?

  • 12.26.2012 11:24 AM PDT

Stupidity, when sufficiently advanced, is indistinguishable from magic

Posted by: MrR46
Posted by: Binman59
Yeah and they figured removing bloom on precision weapons but not on automatic ones was completely fine and wouldn't lead to even more DMR OPness

Alright, I'll say this one definitive time... anyone who defends the presence of bloom in a FPS is dumber than a box of rat turds and should be stripped of their right to an opinion.
You fail to grasp the concept of bloom completely, though. I'm not defending it, but to say it's indefensible means that you just don't understand it. If you want me to explain, please PM me, I'd be happy to.

  • 12.26.2012 11:25 AM PDT


Posted by: Gaara444
They're trying to tank Reach so everyone goes to Halo 4. A real hit to the balls, but apparently it's working.

You know you can only have two player splitscreen in Reach now right?
more then 2 was too much for me to look at anyways because my screen was too small.

  • 12.26.2012 11:28 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Honorable Heroic Member
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Your 'beliefs' mean less than dick to me.

Posted by: supertripon
Posted by: MrR46
Posted by: Binman59
Yeah and they figured removing bloom on precision weapons but not on automatic ones was completely fine and wouldn't lead to even more DMR OPness

Alright, I'll say this one definitive time... anyone who defends the presence of bloom in a FPS is dumber than a box of rat turds and should be stripped of their right to an opinion.
You fail to grasp the concept of bloom completely, though. I'm not defending it, but to say it's indefensible means that you just don't understand it. If you want me to explain, please PM me, I'd be happy to.

Oh yes mister expert, plz explain teh bloomz to me!

Bloom is a mechanic that punishes people for trying to win their encounters, and all it does is either slow the game down considerably or bring randomness into the equation. It's garbage and a really cheap way of nerfing weapons at distance.

  • 12.26.2012 11:30 AM PDT

action sack is a hilarious name

  • 12.26.2012 11:30 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2