- ShotgunTroll
- |
- Fabled Heroic Member
Posted by: ShotgunTroll
Posted by: Gruntzilla24
I don't think anyone here is in favor of totally banning guns.
There are legal solutions to these mass shootings. Instead of being a total -blam!-, why don't you support these solutions? because if you'd bother doing actual factual, you'd know you have no real ground on which to accuse legal gun owners of being the cause of crimes. we have a poor justice system, a poor education system, a poor healthcare system, too much unemployment rates, over 11 million illegal invaders, and an aging infrastructure. get rid of those problems and you stop a lot of crimes.
instead you just repeat whatever false info you're told on the news, never thinking, never questioning, never learning.
hell i posted resources with which to start doing research in the OP.
it gets ignored because "Hurr, doesn't support my position. it's invalid". we're not being unreasonable, it's the people who don't listen to fact and only want feel good laws that don't solve any problems who're being unreasonable.
we're trying to teach ya something but it's only met with a NOOOPE.avi response
what good does an AWB do? we had one before and crime ONLY went up.
because it only bans guns that some politician thinks looks scary. no functions affected, just looks and the legal citizens affected.
and the so called Assalt wepunz are used in less than 1% of all gun crime.
94% of ALL gun crime is gang members killing other gang members with small handguns in small calibers like .22 short.
Semi-auto means only one shot per trigger pull. hold the trigger and you'll still only have fired one shot until you let go and pull again.
>ban MGs!
uh, they already did. in 1934 they required a $200 registration. on May 19, 1986 they closed the registry, defacto banning new MGs for non-government use.
what's more is that there have only been 5 crimes committed with a registered MG since 1934 till now. 2 of those being a police officer's murder-suicide.
>ban the high cap mags!
uh, we tried that before. didn't stop crime at all. Columbine used several 10 rounder magazines in fact. reloading is a pain, drops the fun level at the range.
criminals don't care about that anyways
and "high cap" is a misnomer because 30 round mags for say an AR-15 or AKM pattern rifle is actually standard capacity.
>background check when you buy guns/gunshow loophole
uh have you never heard of a 4473 or bill of sale?
>registration
historically has always been the first step to confiscation.
>well regulated
at that time, the words meant well functioning.
and besides, the early US navy and Cannons used in the rev war were privately owned.
>no militia
Militia act of 1903 says every eligible male from 18-45 IS the militia
>they only had muskets and kentucky long rifles.
grape shot, girandoni air rifle, and puckel gun.
so what do you do? put welfare recipients in gov't factory jobs making things in the US, working for their money and take other measures to improve mental and physical healthcare and education, fix the infrastructure and reduce the underlying sociological root causes of crime.
and "mass shootings". that's also a misnomer. those are actually small, irregular minority events that receive massive publicity from a sensationalist politically agenda-ized media with no interest in truth. they are NOT as common as you think. they're just FAR more publicized.
the worst attack on a US school happened the day before lindburgh crossed the Atlantic and was a bombing by a PO'd Assistant Principal. over 150 people killed. nearly no publicity due to said flight though.
if we really do use the same scapegoating against guns,without bias or twisting, logic dictates
Boxcutters caused 9/11.
Fertilizer caused Oklahoma City.anyone even gonna try to refute this?