Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Games that actually require teamwork to win...
  • Subject: Games that actually require teamwork to win...
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Games that actually require teamwork to win...


Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Delta SWE
Posted by: iLeGiTx iTANKo
League of Legends.
LoL is for slow-blam!-s
Lol.

Somebody prefers Dota...

  • 12.27.2012 6:09 PM PDT

Per Audacia Ad Astra

Army of Two.

  • 12.27.2012 6:09 PM PDT

Sometimes I am tempted to quit gaming. I can no longer play without seeing ponyphags, horrendously bad teammates and mexicans.

Gaming community, I want you to know that you suck.

Gears. Halo MLG. Battlefield.

  • 12.27.2012 6:09 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Sometimes, I dream about cheese.

Halo 2

  • 12.27.2012 6:10 PM PDT


Posted by: Connor CMC
Gears. Halo MLG. Battlefield.

Lol nope, unless you mean the pro circuit then no, and definitely no.

  • 12.27.2012 6:10 PM PDT

<(-_-)> Teh mokey is not amused

Posted by: ansac11
Halo: Reach Invasion. You can't fight off like 6 guys by yourself.

I did once, nearly won as well. I think the final score was 79-84 or something like that. (Twas invasion slayer)

  • 12.27.2012 6:13 PM PDT

Left 4 Dead.
Resident Evil.

[Edited on 12.27.2012 6:14 PM PST]

  • 12.27.2012 6:13 PM PDT


Posted by: culexus

Posted by: Vidgameplayer007
Battlefield 3.

  • 12.27.2012 6:15 PM PDT

left 4 dead 2 verses.

  • 12.27.2012 6:16 PM PDT

Sometimes I am tempted to quit gaming. I can no longer play without seeing ponyphags, horrendously bad teammates and mexicans.

Gaming community, I want you to know that you suck.


Posted by: What Is This1

Posted by: Connor CMC
Gears. Halo MLG. Battlefield.

Lol nope, unless you mean the pro circuit then no, and definitely no.

Do you mean Halo 4/Reach, because I never mean them.

  • 12.27.2012 6:18 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I like games and music

Posted by: iLeGiTx iTANKo

Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Delta SWE
Posted by: iLeGiTx iTANKo
League of Legends.
LoL is for slow-blam!-s
Lol.

Somebody prefers Dota...
Heroes of Newerth actually, because of the controls and speed is just right to me.

  • 12.27.2012 6:19 PM PDT


Posted by: Connor CMC

Posted by: What Is This1

Posted by: Connor CMC
Gears. Halo MLG. Battlefield.

Lol nope, unless you mean the pro circuit then no, and definitely no.

Do you mean Halo 4/Reach, because I never mean them.

Obviously no since I never mean them too. Pretty much every if not every team based game out there if you are good enough you can carry a team to victory. Halo is no exception to that and the same can be said for what a lot of people ITT are naming.

  • 12.27.2012 6:22 PM PDT


Posted by: Delta SWE
Posted by: iLeGiTx iTANKo

Posted by: Hylebos
Posted by: Delta SWE
Posted by: iLeGiTx iTANKo
League of Legends.
LoL is for slow-blam!-s
Lol.

Somebody prefers Dota...
Heroes of Newerth actually, because of the controls and speed is just right to me.

If youre referring to the map/scroll speed or the control setup of LoL, you know thats all adjustable, right?

If youre referring to the actual gameplay speed, well, thats a personal problem.

  • 12.27.2012 6:23 PM PDT

Posted by: aBlueBookshelf
Goat was famous. Irie was infamous. Gh0st was FaMaS.

My stats in Halol 4

Typical Waypoint post.
no it's "its got to go" you wouldn't say the "it is got to go" would you?

Counter Strike

  • 12.27.2012 6:24 PM PDT

Sometimes I am tempted to quit gaming. I can no longer play without seeing ponyphags, horrendously bad teammates and mexicans.

Gaming community, I want you to know that you suck.


Posted by: What Is This1
Obviously no since I never mean them too. Pretty much every if not every team based game out there if you are good enough you can carry a team to victory. Halo is no exception to that and the same can be said for what a lot of people ITT are naming.
...so?

These suggestions are assuming the other team isn't a bunch of retards and actually have functioning hands.

  • 12.27.2012 6:25 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Tom
USNSCC, E-3

The Line of Steel
Basically, it's a blog of mine that focuses on military and policy related issues. Feel free to bookmark it and PM me any ideas you have to improve its quality. I hope you enjoy it!

Endwar

  • 12.27.2012 6:25 PM PDT


Posted by: Recon Number 54
Tug-o-war

  • 12.27.2012 6:25 PM PDT



Posted by: Connor CMC
...so?

These suggestions are assuming the other team isn't a bunch of retards and actually have functioning hands.

Not true at all even good teams will lose against someone that is overall better than them. For that reason the game doesn't require teamwork at least not overall. There are some instances where teamwork is needed, but even then that can be overcome with a person good enough. It isn't hard to beat good teams carrying your team. I have done it hundreds of times in a lot of the games named ITT.

  • 12.27.2012 6:29 PM PDT

Posted by: BoyceKRP
duckingd
drink
seriously
me bell sean ressea ellio tand i
-blam!-img party. totallt waasted . ph my god.
i called ashy;n, i dnno if that was a good ideo. i'ma sleep with her or sometning, fujuuuck

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Halo 4 Dominion

I mean honestly most multiplayer games require teamwork. If my team just was sitting around and barely trying in a match of Halo 3 I'd lose, no matter how well I carried them. Especially in Slayer where their deaths count.

But those are two that came to mind

  • 12.27.2012 6:33 PM PDT

Sometimes I am tempted to quit gaming. I can no longer play without seeing ponyphags, horrendously bad teammates and mexicans.

Gaming community, I want you to know that you suck.


Posted by: What Is This1


Posted by: Connor CMC
...so?

These suggestions are assuming the other team isn't a bunch of retards and actually have functioning hands.

Not true at all even good teams will lose against someone that is overall better than them. For that reason the game doesn't require teamwork at least not overall. There are some instances where teamwork is needed, but even then that can be overcome with a person good enough. It isn't hard to beat good teams carrying your team. I have done it hundreds of times in a lot of the games named ITT.
So basically the only legitimate options are RTSs because they have unit limits per player.

k.

  • 12.27.2012 6:34 PM PDT

Muffins are just ugly cupcakes

Battlefield, left 4 dead, objective gametypes in Halo.

  • 12.27.2012 6:34 PM PDT


Posted by: spirit of sand
Battlefield Bad Company 2

Halo 4 Dominion

I mean honestly most multiplayer games require teamwork. If my team just was sitting around and barely trying in a match of Halo 3 I'd lose, no matter how well I carried them. Especially in Slayer where their deaths count.

But those are two that came to mind

That is because you were not good enough at the game. Simply put if you are good enough you can carry a team to victory. In Halo 3 it might take going +20 in a game of TS, but it is still doable. So really your phrase should be "if you aren't good enough at a game it requires teamwork."

  • 12.27.2012 6:35 PM PDT

Posted by: Recon Number 54
Life is a journey, if you spend all of it with your nose in your map, you may miss some of the best parts.


Posted by: What Is This1


Posted by: Connor CMC
...so?

These suggestions are assuming the other team isn't a bunch of retards and actually have functioning hands.

Not true at all even good teams will lose against someone that is overall better than them. For that reason the game doesn't require teamwork at least not overall. There are some instances where teamwork is needed, but even then that can be overcome with a person good enough. It isn't hard to beat good teams carrying your team. I have done it hundreds of times in a lot of the games named ITT.


the hell is this

If you can beat "teams" by yourself, you're clearly not playing against a team, but rather just a group of randies. Any competent team can take down a bunch of randoms, even if one of them is even decent. You've clearly haven't played any teams.

  • 12.27.2012 6:38 PM PDT


Posted by: Connor CMC
So basically the only legitimate options are RTSs because they have unit limits per player.

k.

Pretty much, but even then you can win them without teamwork given on how good/bad the other team is and how good your strategy compared to their strategy is. For the most part unless a game requires you to cooperate with your teammate(s) to win there is some form of exception than can apply to that game making it not require teamwork.

  • 12.27.2012 6:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

"The one who follows the crowd will usually get no further than the crowd. The one who walks alone, is likely to find himself in places no one has ever been."
-Albert Einstein

"To live is the rarest thing in the word. Most people exist, that is all"
-Oscar Wilde

Steam

Natural Selection 2 is a great example.

You need at least 2 competent players to win.

  • 12.27.2012 6:42 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4