Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Would this have made Farcry 3 a better story? (spoilers)
  • Subject: Would this have made Farcry 3 a better story? (spoilers)
Subject: Would this have made Farcry 3 a better story? (spoilers)

Twitter - The Best song in the world I Send me teh friend request.

Here there, baby.

Compliments: Posted by: awesomesauce46
I hope you die in a fire.

Instead of killing Vaas first, you kill Hoyt.


I think it would've been better if Vaas was the final boss. I hated Vaas from the start, but I loved him as a villain. Killing him brought me a lot of satisfaction, but that was only half way through the game, so I had no real hatred to kill this 'Hoyt' person now and just playing the game to finish it.

  • 12.30.2012 8:11 PM PDT

Posted by: x Foman123 x

Posted by: TH3_AV3NG3R
What house has a rocket pod, has legs, and has a long narrow barrel that probably shoots something powerful?

Sounds like you're describing the lower half of my body, actually.

No vaas helped with the meaning of the satire with the main character.

  • 12.30.2012 8:13 PM PDT

It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank god that such men lived. ----------- No Bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country. (both by George S. Patton jr.)

I think you should have shot down the para-gliding trip before all of this happened

  • 12.30.2012 8:13 PM PDT

I agree to some extent. I don't know what I would have done to change it, but Vaas (in my opinion) was the person who you should have hated more and who was a crazy character. Once you killed him, you knew Hoyt was bad and commissioned him to do those things but since Hoyt didn't do it himself, you didn't feel as much hatred.

I'm indecisive though, I really liked the campaign and they still did a good job of making you dislike Hoyt. One thing I can for-sure agree on is that I wanted to see more of Vaas.

  • 12.30.2012 8:21 PM PDT

I don't necessarily agree, but I think Vaas should've played a bigger role in the game

  • 12.30.2012 8:22 PM PDT

Because aliens.

There should have been more weed burning.

  • 12.30.2012 8:26 PM PDT

Posted by: x Foman123 x

Posted by: TH3_AV3NG3R
What house has a rocket pod, has legs, and has a long narrow barrel that probably shoots something powerful?

Sounds like you're describing the lower half of my body, actually.


Posted by: xGamepro422x
I don't necessarily agree, but I think Vaas should've played a bigger role in the game

He did... He pretty much told the audience that even though the reasons for killing is different you are still me. You kill millions of people to get what you want(Helping your friends but at the same time revenge), while in other games they make it seem like you are a glorified hero for killing people.

Actually, the interrogation scene helped with the spectrum about games.

  • 12.30.2012 8:26 PM PDT

Oh, you think darkness is your ally. You merely adopted the dark. I was born in it, molded by it. I didn’t see the light until I was already a man. By then, it was nothing to me but BLINDING!

I have to give Hoyt credit for being a great villain. Don't make me choose between them!

  • 12.30.2012 8:33 PM PDT

I think Hoyt should've been a required major side quest with Vaas being the main bad guy. I did feel like once I killed Vaas then I had no more motive and the game dulled for me. Vaas was probably the best character in a game in a long time. He kept -blam!- me over but made me respect him for it.

  • 12.30.2012 8:38 PM PDT

I think that Vaas should have been the head. I mean, yeah is craziness would make for bad business, but he was the reason you wanted to save you friends. there was really no purpose for going after hoyt, other than you found your brother that you thought was dead anyways.

  • 12.30.2012 8:44 PM PDT