- Tibetz
- |
- Exalted Mythic Member
____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)
Posted by: car15
Posted by: Tibetz
Posted by: car15
Posted by: Tibetz
And for what reasons is this specific version of a family unit the only acceptable one?
It's not, but I believe it is the one that works best. At any rate, it is the one being vilified by feminists for no reason at all.
Feminists: seek equal standing
your family unit: seeks unequal standing, promotes equal importance (whatever the hell that means)
I can't possibly fathom how Feminists could be against such a thing.
I never said that I was confused about that. Feminists are all about seeking equal standing. (Although many of them actually want to subjugate men, but that's another discussion for another time.)
That's obvious.
However, it's based on a false premise that women are equal in function to men. They are not. They think differently. Their bodies perform different reproductive tasks. These are self-evident facts but they are supported by scientific research. (Especially the latter, LOL.)
Congratulations, they perform different reproductive tasks. Sure, they TEND to think different from men. Yet your family unit seems to indicate that all women think alike about everything, and all men think alike about everything. A REALISTIC family unit would be one where two people meet with corresponding views on who their partner and their family life should be like.
How that relationship forms thereon may resemble your particular family unit preference, but it may have the roles reversed, or the specific roles intermixed.
Two people should find out how they fit together, rather than try and force a square peg into a round hole, so to speak, just to fulfil an archaic social practice.