Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Are we on the verge of a New World Order police state?
  • Subject: Are we on the verge of a New World Order police state?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Are we on the verge of a New World Order police state?
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.

Alex Jones Interviews Aaron Russo (Full Length)

This is really interesting stuff.

If you're too lazy to watch the full hour-long interview at least watch this highlight reel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCpjmvaIgNA.

It makes sense. Break the family unit, construct the state as a surrogate parent, and then make people reliant on the state for everything. Total control.

I don't know about the conspiracy aspects of what Russo has to say (like the stuff about the Rockefellers and the CIA) but there is evidence to support it. Gloria Steinem was funded by the CIA, for God's sake.

  • 12.31.2012 1:43 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member
  • gamertag: Aj6627
  • user homepage:

Posted by: Anton P Nym
who says you have to be an ace to have fun?

Posted by: TUI_Obi_Wan
Stupid parents let their stupid children play games that are rated M when they should be playing Big Birds Spelling Adventures

Posted by: Kira Onime
Also the AR is actually good in CQB now and no longer a glorified baseball bat.

Alex Jones invalidates anything he is associated with IMO.

  • 12.31.2012 1:47 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)

"Break the family unit"

Yeah, because the family unit is dependent on fatherly dominance.

If anything, "the family unit" would be more susceptible to tyranny than independent individuals.

  • 12.31.2012 1:52 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: Tibetz
"Break the family unit"

Yeah, because the family unit is dependent on fatherly dominance.

If anything, "the family unit" would be more susceptible to tyranny than independent individuals.

The family unit is not dependent on fatherly dominance. It is a cooperative union between a man and a woman. Each serves a different, but equally important, function in maintaining the union. The kids are subservient to the parents until they mature and move out, after which they are expected to care for the parents in their senescence.

Ideally, neither the man nor the woman is "in charge" of the unit. They make decisions together and agree to act together.

Don't let feminist propaganda and old '50s TV shows mislead you.

  • 12.31.2012 2:01 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)


Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz
"Break the family unit"

Yeah, because the family unit is dependent on fatherly dominance.

If anything, "the family unit" would be more susceptible to tyranny than independent individuals.

The family unit is not dependent on fatherly dominance. It is a cooperative union between a man and a woman. Each serves a different, but equally important, function in maintaining the union. The kids are subservient to the parents until they mature and move out, after which they are expected to care for the parents in their senescence.

Ideally, neither the man nor the woman is "in charge" of the unit. They make decisions together and agree to act together.

Don't let feminist propaganda and old '50s TV shows mislead you.


Nice try. Feminism by definition would cause absolutely no issues with any of your points. If both sides feel they have equal standing with one another in their relationship, why would feminism even be an issue in the family? It promotes equality.

  • 12.31.2012 2:06 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: Tibetz

Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz
"Break the family unit"

Yeah, because the family unit is dependent on fatherly dominance.

If anything, "the family unit" would be more susceptible to tyranny than independent individuals.

The family unit is not dependent on fatherly dominance. It is a cooperative union between a man and a woman. Each serves a different, but equally important, function in maintaining the union. The kids are subservient to the parents until they mature and move out, after which they are expected to care for the parents in their senescence.

Ideally, neither the man nor the woman is "in charge" of the unit. They make decisions together and agree to act together.

Don't let feminist propaganda and old '50s TV shows mislead you.


Nice try. Feminism by definition would cause absolutely no issues with any of your points. If both sides feel they have equal standing with one another in their relationship, why would feminism even be an issue in the family? It promotes equality.

No. Both sides are of equal importance, not equal standing. Men and women have different roles in a relationship. It is incorrect to call the man "dominant" because without the input of the woman, provided she is performing her proper role, the relationship cannot thrive.

[Edited on 12.31.2012 2:09 AM PST]

  • 12.31.2012 2:09 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

The Searcher sucks. Nobody date him.

All I know is, if this results in the rise of masked vigilantes on rooftops, then I'm all for it!

  • 12.31.2012 2:12 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)


Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz

Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz
"Break the family unit"

Yeah, because the family unit is dependent on fatherly dominance.

If anything, "the family unit" would be more susceptible to tyranny than independent individuals.

The family unit is not dependent on fatherly dominance. It is a cooperative union between a man and a woman. Each serves a different, but equally important, function in maintaining the union. The kids are subservient to the parents until they mature and move out, after which they are expected to care for the parents in their senescence.

Ideally, neither the man nor the woman is "in charge" of the unit. They make decisions together and agree to act together.

Don't let feminist propaganda and old '50s TV shows mislead you.


Nice try. Feminism by definition would cause absolutely no issues with any of your points. If both sides feel they have equal standing with one another in their relationship, why would feminism even be an issue in the family? It promotes equality.

No. Both sides are of equal importance, not equal standing. Men and women have different roles in a relationship. It is incorrect to call the man "dominant" because without the input of the woman, provided she is performing her proper role, the relationship cannot thrive.


And for what reasons is this specific version of a family unit the only acceptable one?

  • 12.31.2012 2:22 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: Tibetz
And for what reasons is this specific version of a family unit the only acceptable one?

It's not, but I believe it is the one that works best. At any rate, it is the one being vilified by feminists for no reason at all.

  • 12.31.2012 2:32 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)


Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz
And for what reasons is this specific version of a family unit the only acceptable one?

It's not, but I believe it is the one that works best. At any rate, it is the one being vilified by feminists for no reason at all.

Feminists: seek equal standing

your family unit: seeks unequal standing, promotes equal importance (whatever the hell that means)

I can't possibly fathom how Feminists could be against such a thing.

  • 12.31.2012 2:33 AM PDT

BrAdLeY

New World Order is coming be prepared

  • 12.31.2012 2:36 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: Tibetz

Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz
And for what reasons is this specific version of a family unit the only acceptable one?

It's not, but I believe it is the one that works best. At any rate, it is the one being vilified by feminists for no reason at all.

Feminists: seek equal standing

your family unit: seeks unequal standing, promotes equal importance (whatever the hell that means)

I can't possibly fathom how Feminists could be against such a thing.

I never said that I was confused about that. Feminists are all about seeking equal standing. (Although many of them actually want to subjugate men, but that's another discussion for another time.)

That's obvious.

However, it's based on a false premise that women are equal in function to men. They are not. They think differently. Their bodies perform different reproductive tasks. These are self-evident facts but they are supported by scientific research. (Especially the latter, LOL.)

  • 12.31.2012 2:40 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)


Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz

Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz
And for what reasons is this specific version of a family unit the only acceptable one?

It's not, but I believe it is the one that works best. At any rate, it is the one being vilified by feminists for no reason at all.

Feminists: seek equal standing

your family unit: seeks unequal standing, promotes equal importance (whatever the hell that means)

I can't possibly fathom how Feminists could be against such a thing.

I never said that I was confused about that. Feminists are all about seeking equal standing. (Although many of them actually want to subjugate men, but that's another discussion for another time.)

That's obvious.

However, it's based on a false premise that women are equal in function to men. They are not. They think differently. Their bodies perform different reproductive tasks. These are self-evident facts but they are supported by scientific research. (Especially the latter, LOL.)


Congratulations, they perform different reproductive tasks. Sure, they TEND to think different from men. Yet your family unit seems to indicate that all women think alike about everything, and all men think alike about everything. A REALISTIC family unit would be one where two people meet with corresponding views on who their partner and their family life should be like.

How that relationship forms thereon may resemble your particular family unit preference, but it may have the roles reversed, or the specific roles intermixed.

Two people should find out how they fit together, rather than try and force a square peg into a round hole, so to speak, just to fulfil an archaic social practice.

  • 12.31.2012 2:46 AM PDT

Marine Corps.
Semper Fi.

Posted by: Wikked Navajoe
My problems [with Reach] are basically just full parties, mlg, and people who go out of their way not to get killed.

Not even close.

  • 12.31.2012 2:48 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: Tibetz
Sure, they TEND to think different from men. Yet your family unit seems to indicate that all women think alike about everything, and all men think alike about everything. A REALISTIC family unit would be one where two people meet with corresponding views on who their partner and their family life should be like.

And that's fine. If two hom0 dudes want to get together and raise a family, that is fine by me. What I don't like is the vilification of the traditional family in the media. Minoritized groups feel for some reason that they have to "stick it to the man" and criticize dominant social institutions in order to achieve progress, which ironically only makes it harder for them to be accepted by the rest of society.

Of course all women don't think alike. I recognize that. Society needs to be more tolerant of alternative family structures, but that should not happen at the cost of the vilification of the family structure that most people practice.

You see?

[Edited on 12.31.2012 2:57 AM PST]

  • 12.31.2012 2:56 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Exalted Mythic Member

____________(˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜||˜˜˜˜˜)_∏______
l | --------____.`=====.-.~:________\___|================[oo]
|_|||___/___/_/~```|_|_|_|``(o)----------<)


Posted by: car15

Posted by: Tibetz
Sure, they TEND to think different from men. Yet your family unit seems to indicate that all women think alike about everything, and all men think alike about everything. A REALISTIC family unit would be one where two people meet with corresponding views on who their partner and their family life should be like.

And that's fine. If two hom0 dudes want to get together and raise a family, that is fine by me. What I don't like is the vilification of the traditional family in the media. Minoritized groups feel for some reason that they have to "stick it to the man" and criticize dominant social institutions in order to achieve progress, which ironically only makes it harder for them to be accepted by the rest of society.

Of course all women don't think alike. I recognize that. Society needs to be more tolerant of alternative family structures, but that should not happen at the cost of the vilification of the family structure that most people practice.

You see?


No one vilifies that structure, they vilify the motives. I have nothing against a stay at home mom with a hard working father.

What I dislike is the idea that the stay at home mom is forced to be that way because she isn't allowed by social conditions to be anything else. ESPECIALLY when she is raised from birth to think that she can never amount to anything else. Which is what families in that particular type of family unit tend to teach their daughters.

  • 12.31.2012 2:59 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: Tibetz
Which is what families in that particular type of family unit tend to teach their daughters.

Families are responsible for educating their children. The children may defy the teachings of their parents and come to their own conclusions later in life but it is not society's place to step in and say, "Okay, stop teaching your kids XYZ because it goes against what we believe." No. That is ridiculous. A Christian father should be allowed to raise his child with Christian beliefs. A pro-choice mother should be allowed to raise her child with those beliefs. A family that believes in the traditional nuclear family structure should be allowed to raise their children with those beliefs. You get the picture.

You may not like it but it is not your place or anyone else's place to step in and tell people that they're parenting their kids wrong if no abuse is taking place.

  • 12.31.2012 3:05 AM PDT

http://i.imgur.com/fsISj.png

1) A worldwide dictatorship government would be good for our species.

2) Alex Jones (USA) is a joke.

  • 12.31.2012 3:16 AM PDT

Something smells fishy...

No it's not. No where close to being a police state.

And the NWO thing is a conspiracy theory.

[Edited on 12.31.2012 3:21 AM PST]

  • 12.31.2012 3:20 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: Barnacle_Blast
No it's not. No where close to being a police state.

And the NWO thing is a conspiracy theory.


Are you so sure?

  • 12.31.2012 3:22 AM PDT

http://i.imgur.com/fsISj.png

Posted by: car15
Posted by: Barnacle_Blast
No it's not. No where close to being a police state.

And the NWO thing is a conspiracy theory.

Are you so sure?

Sadly, Barnacle is correct. That is nowhere near to anything vaguely like the construction of a police state.

  • 12.31.2012 3:23 AM PDT

Just dance 4- Lindsey Stirling

Dead-body-ologist at The U.S. Army 18th Medical Command

Posted by: Viper Skills
Not even close.

  • 12.31.2012 3:25 AM PDT

Something smells fishy...


Posted by: car15

Posted by: Barnacle_Blast
No it's not. No where close to being a police state.

And the NWO thing is a conspiracy theory.


Are you so sure?


Yes I'm sure. I don't want to live in a police state. I'm just stating that we don't live in one.

  • 12.31.2012 3:27 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Posting dark & edgy opinions since 2012.

muh family values

  • 12.31.2012 3:30 AM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

A 3 Legged Goat
Nobody cares about anyone else's opinion - be it mine, yours, or a cult of angry star wars nerds - when they are enjoying what they enjoy.

Zombine
Everyone cares about opinions, that's why we socialize on a forum with strangers.


Posted by: annoyinginge
Posted by: car15
Posted by: Barnacle_Blast
No it's not. No where close to being a police state.

And the NWO thing is a conspiracy theory.

Are you so sure?

Sadly, Barnacle is correct. That is nowhere near to anything vaguely like the construction of a police state.

How do you define a police state?

  • 12.31.2012 3:36 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2