- The Ruckus 2010
- |
- Intrepid Legendary Member
Name's John. I'm a 21-year-old firefighter/EMT from lolhio who doubles as a die-hard Halo fan. I've been enjoying the franchise since 2001. My favorite iteration of Halo would have to be Halo 2 simply because I never got to experience the joy of a full-on Halo: CE LAN.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
Oh yeah, and boot Zome.
Posted by: Shiro2809
I don't remember any of what he said there, apart from Anakin having an extraordinarily high amount, but couldn't the explanation be that the midochlorians allow people to use the force, while the force still being what Yoda originally said?
Posted by: The Ruckus 2010
Posted by: Quharke
Clarification on something doesn't destroy it.
It was hardly clarification. It was a twenty-second scene where midichlorians were passively mentioned and given a weak explanation. It was unnecessary. They had a pre-existing explanation of the Force courtesy of the original trilogy (Episode V in particular). Applying a scientific explanation that doesn't make sense even within the context of the film's own universe does destroy it.
I don't see how any of Yoda's sayings were contradicted.
Watch the videos again. One example would be Yoda stating that the Force enveloped everything and essentially made the world go round, when actually they're just microorganisms living within sentient beings.
That's true I guess. It still doesn't make sense as to why one's ability to manipulate the supernatural is quantified by biological organisms, but whatever. Either way, legions of Star Wars nerds far more devoted than I hate the prequels for canon breaks I am unaware of because I honestly don't care that much.
The prequels were just more poorly done overall what with the shotty acting and forced effects everywhere. I think the number of real sets in the prequels could be counted on one hand if I recall correctly, which adds to actor confusion and just awkward performances depending on the actor.