- aTALLmidget
- |
- Noble Legendary Member
Posted by: BlazingAngel94
Posted by: aTALLmidget
Posted by: BlazingAngel94
In actual warfare, what's the purpose of destroying everything in sight? The main Battlefield games and Bad Company games are different in that aspect, one's more of a sandbox with utter destruction while the other is more authentic in combat.
Besides, micro destruction kicks ass.
In actual warfare the purpose of destruction isn't just to destroy but to eliminate an enemy target or his hiding place. In actual warfare destruction can be just as widespread like in Bad Company - the best example would be World War II with entire cities leveled. It shouldn't be a surprise that if armored vehicles roll into an area saturated with hostiles that there are going to be a few destroyed buildings.
In modern day warfare, we have missiles capable of hitting a target with near perfect accuracy. We didn't have that back in WWII thus it was necessary to drop a -blam!- load of bombs in a wide area to get the same effects as a single tomahawk cruise missile.
This is true, yet destruction will always be a part of warfare. You can get as accurate as you want but it will never be totally clean.