Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: You have to burn your family or nuke a country
  • Subject: You have to burn your family or nuke a country
Subject: You have to burn your family or nuke a country
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

They don't think it be like it is...


But it do.

Nuke Russia in an area where nobody would be harmed.

  • 01.05.2013 2:00 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

We oG now.

The GOAT:

Posted by: AK FROST
Who cares if I lie?

Mexico.

Seriously.

  • 01.05.2013 2:04 PM PDT

everything/anything can be compared to sand on a beach

nuke mexico.

  • 01.05.2013 2:06 PM PDT

I wouldn't nuke north Korea because believe it or not, not everyone there supports the evil regime

If it had to be one place, probably Ukraine

  • 01.05.2013 2:06 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: VeryGray ninja
Nuke Canada because they gave us bieber.

Reason why at least Finland should not be nuked.

OT: I don't think it would be too bad if one of those nukes was dropped to Beijing.

[Edited on 01.05.2013 2:10 PM PST]

  • 01.05.2013 2:08 PM PDT

~:O>~~

Not sure if most of you are serious...







Or just going with it.

  • 01.05.2013 2:09 PM PDT

Forever Pyro

Finland.

  • 01.05.2013 2:10 PM PDT


Posted by: thebig100
I would nuke Sea-Land.


Wouldn't that also mess the UK up you know it's not so far away from it but lol killing four people with a nuke is a bit much anyway.

[Edited on 01.05.2013 2:41 PM PST]

  • 01.05.2013 2:39 PM PDT

*reminisces when the Bungie/Halo community wasn't made up of CoD kids*
*sighs*
*activates time-machine and sets the clock back to Nov. 9, 2004*
glory days here I come..
*vanishes*


Posted by: Tripp9
I would nuke North Korea because, I mean , who wouldn't? Plus I love my family.

Fool.
Then South Korea would suffer from the fallout effects.

  • 01.05.2013 2:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I'd nuke the Vatican city, they are all living a lie plus most of them are going to die soon anyway.

  • 01.05.2013 2:45 PM PDT


Posted by: An monkey hero
Seriously? None of you thought about Zimbabwe or some other shjtty country like that?


You see, Zimbabwe is in Africa, and American media and us Americans in general probably couldn't point out Africa on a map. We like to pretend it doesn't exist for some reason, so to us there's just a huge swath of Atlantic and/or Indian ocean instead. I think we ignore it because or lack of involvement in the area kind of contradicts the world police facade we've been putting up.

OT: Eritrea, worse human rights in the world, behind even North Korea. I'd be doing most of the populace a favor, I think. That or Iran, cause seriously, what the -blam!- guys?

[Edited on 01.05.2013 3:11 PM PST]

  • 01.05.2013 3:08 PM PDT

The sound of iron shocks is stuck in my head, The thunder of the drums dictates
The rhythm of the falls, the number of dead's the rising of the horns, ahead
From the dawn of time to the end of days I will have to run, away
I want to feel the pain and the bitter taste of the blood on my lips, again


Posted by: hazzer the hawk
Nuke Alaska.

Alaska is a state.

Nuke Vatican city, because it covers the least amount of land.

  • 01.05.2013 3:09 PM PDT

Loving all these haters Nuking The vatican. *sarcasm*

Probably Morocco? Least ammount of population.

  • 01.05.2013 3:17 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Veteran Heroic Member

north korea sucks any way.

  • 01.05.2013 4:29 PM PDT

Nuke Antarctica. There's nothing there anyway.

  • 01.05.2013 4:30 PM PDT

Our troops are facing towards the Sun,
Stepping on the earth of Motherland,
Carrying the nation's hope,
We are an indomitable power!
Our troops are facing towards the Sun;
Marching towards the final victory
And the liberation of entire country!

Nuke Sealand, no one lives there.

  • 01.05.2013 4:33 PM PDT