Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Halo 4 or Battlefield 3?
  • Subject: Halo 4 or Battlefield 3?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2
Subject: Halo 4 or Battlefield 3?

Unsuccessfully trying to bring science and reason to The Flood...

Playing BF3 multiplayer is brilliant. I can have pure fun, or I can try really hard and tactically try to win with a bunch of friends.

Halo 4 multiplayer just bores me.


That being said however H4 Campaign >>> BF3 Singleplayer.

  • 01.06.2013 5:43 AM PDT

Why must people always have to go debate on games. It's simple. Even though their is a majority, everyone has their own personal favorites.

  • 01.06.2013 5:44 AM PDT

The DLC map for Battlefield has been amazing, and has improved the game a hundred-fold.

I refused to buy Halo 4 after Reach, so I have t played it. Seems like I dodged a bullet doing so too.

I also play Battlefield 3 on PC which is miles better than my old Xbox version .

Battlefield 3 is the only shooter I play nowadays actually. 64 player Karkand or Oman is still amazing, as are the Aftermath maps.

  • 01.06.2013 5:45 AM PDT

I hate BF3 now. It's just bull-blam!- vehicle hogging, except now everyone and their grandmothers have all the upgrades either from playing or from buying them, which makes them far more formidable.

I liked the early days. They were the most balanced, because no one had the best vehicle upgrades and there were few experts so it was infantry combat with a few vehicles thrown in. Now it's straight up vehicle combat with infantry getting mowed down. Plus the server hosts kicking you for winning is annoying. I can't play with friends anymore because one or more of us usually gets kicked and banned before we even finish the match.

TL;DR I hate BF3 now.

  • 01.06.2013 5:58 AM PDT
  • gamertag: ankerd
  • user homepage:

Bringing in Fikst. Bringing back lmao.
Inheritor # 475 world,

#6 In the Country.

Halocharts.com

NATA

  • 01.06.2013 5:59 AM PDT

Posted by: The Random
Posted by: AcedannyK 7
Posted by: The Random
BF3 co-op > H4 Co-op
I thought BF3 co-op was horrible and downright painful to play.

At least you're given completely different objectives in each mission, and with them different ways to play. With Spartan Ops, you're given the same objectives on the same maps recycled over and over again.

Plus, Palmer is annoying to listen to.
That's fair, I'm not a huge fan of spops and Palmer is a -blam!- but remember 4 player campaign is there too.

  • 01.06.2013 6:01 AM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

I like Cheese


Posted by: X El BaZzA X
Neither, they are both terrible. Halo 4 is full to the brim of casual nonsense and little flaws, but Battlefield 3 is just awful. It's a generic 'realistic' (lol) reflex shooter where whoever shoots first wins and aiming is pathetically easy because of how slow you move.

Everyone always tries to argue how realistic BF3 is - but it isn't. BF3 has good graphics, and not much else. I never realised respawning was realistic. Or healing bullet wounds with a defib. Or health being measured as a percentage. Or bullet wounds regenerating over time. Or being able to put floating orange arrows over enemies heads.

As soon as you mention these things to a BF3 realism fanboy, they realise that perhaps BF3 isn't so realistic after all. But that's because it's for 'good gameplay'.

TL;DR BF3 tried to balance realism with gameplay and ended up doing them both horribly.

  • 01.06.2013 6:02 AM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • of 2