Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Poll [133 votes]: Which type of warfare is most terrifying?
  • Poll [133 votes]: Which type of warfare is most terrifying?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Which type of warfare is most terrifying?

Da Husk.

Poll: Which type of warfare is most terrifying?  [closed]
Nuclear:  21%
(28 Votes)
Chemical:  20%
(26 Votes)
Biological:  56%
(75 Votes)
Cyber:  3%
(4 Votes)
Total Votes: 133

So Flood, which type of warfare is most horrifying to you?

For me, biological.

You, Flood?

  • 01.06.2013 6:57 PM PDT

Posted by: Kneecap
I keep on getting in conversations with a person who calls me John.

Modern.

Thank you, thank you.

  • 01.06.2013 6:57 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Biological.

Being eaten alive by a flesh eating virus doesn't sound to fun.

  • 01.06.2013 6:58 PM PDT

Zombies are 2spooky

  • 01.06.2013 6:58 PM PDT

Emotional. Breaking a person down mentally is the worst thing you can do. ?Without killing them that is.

  • 01.06.2013 6:58 PM PDT

Fellow Floodian:
Posted by: Oh This Dude
I had a very similar thing, only I threw a 14 story building out of a pool and hit a kid on a paper aeroplane.


The Flood is just this awesome :D

Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.

  • 01.06.2013 6:58 PM PDT

Posted by: Falcon Saber
I like how your sub box is full of science and political videos but your recommendations are full of anime girls kissing each other.

Just Zoid being Zoid ^_^


Posted by: Deranged Cook1e
Zombies are 2spooky
4u?

  • 01.06.2013 6:59 PM PDT

It'd be a tie between nuclear and Biological.

  • 01.06.2013 6:59 PM PDT

Proud member of the Herd

physcological

  • 01.06.2013 6:59 PM PDT

Da Husk.


Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.

Viruses are biological.

  • 01.06.2013 6:59 PM PDT

"Living to smile, and not to succeed; smiling to inspire happiness, not to give the illusion you are happy; creativity and music to inspire smiling, which in turn inspires happiness; being nice to be happy, not for being perceived a good person."


Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.
Virus = Living, so therefore would be consider biological.

I voted chemical.

[Edited on 01.06.2013 7:00 PM PST]

  • 01.06.2013 6:59 PM PDT

Sometimes, I dream about cheese.

[Didn't get the game reference, detracting my post.]

[Edited on 01.06.2013 7:01 PM PST]

  • 01.06.2013 7:00 PM PDT

For me, it's definitely biological. Nuclear, you got fallout shelters. Cyber isn't really that scary. It mostly comes down to biological and chemical, but because of how fast biological warfare shreds through things, it's definitely the most terrifying to me.

[Edited on 01.06.2013 7:01 PM PST]

  • 01.06.2013 7:01 PM PDT

If you have some free time and don't mind, please check out my Youtube channel, and maybe subscribe? I'd appreciate it.

http://www.youtube.com/user/DreamOfGaming

Biological.

I'd rather have my body burnt up and explode, and feel pain for a small amount of time, then get a deadly virus and feel pain for an extend amount of time.

Actually, I'd rather have neither. :P Peaceful world is best world.

  • 01.06.2013 7:02 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

F0ck the police


Posted by: SoarinWonderbolt
Biological.

Being eaten alive by a flesh eating virus doesn't sound to fun.
I read like 1/5th of a book about Biopreparat, the russian biological weapons program. Pretty scary stuff.

List of things they were making:


Smallpox
Bubonic plague
Anthrax
Venezuelan equine encephalitis
Tularemia
Influenza
Brucellosis
Marburg virus (believed to be under development as of 1992)
Ebola (believed to be under development as of 1992)
Machupo virus (believed to be under development as of 1992)
Veepox (hybrid of Venezuelan equine encephalitis with smallpox)
Ebolapox (hybrid of ebola with smallpox)


[Edited on 01.06.2013 7:03 PM PST]

  • 01.06.2013 7:02 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Swine of War464
physcological


This

  • 01.06.2013 7:03 PM PDT

Posted by: Mind Reaper 771
Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.
Virus = Living, so therefore would be consider biological.

I voted chemical.
Viruses technically aren't living though.They're weird like that.

  • 01.06.2013 7:04 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:


Posted by: Lil Taco 117
Posted by: Mind Reaper 771
Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.
Virus = Living, so therefore would be consider biological.

I voted chemical.
Viruses technically aren't living though.They're weird like that.


Some can be classified as living some can't..

  • 01.06.2013 7:04 PM PDT

in·dif·fer·ence
the fact or state of being indifferent; lack of care or concern and empathy demonstrated by an absence of emotional reactions.

Chemical and Biological fall under the same category for me.
As long as it's airborne it's pretty scary.

  • 01.06.2013 7:04 PM PDT

Posted by: AngryBrute1
Oh yeah, since somebody does not believe what YOU believe; that makes us vapid...
I cannot grasp that what you call "Something happened to nothing, and that nothing became something, and it was smaller than than a period."

Posted by: boomdeyadah
It'd be a tie between nuclear and Biological.

  • 01.06.2013 7:04 PM PDT

Kidding me? Nuclear.

  • 01.06.2013 7:05 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Why, hello there.

All war.

  • 01.06.2013 7:06 PM PDT

"You know the music. Time to dance"
"and laugh, and laugh, and laugh."
[Edited on 12.25.2009 12:52 AM PST]

Biological by far.

  • 01.06.2013 7:06 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

The Last Fighter

Biological is surely, but I think nuclear warfare would be more realistic. I think its just horrible so many countries, including my own (usa) have so many nuclear weapons. One country fires one and BAMB, domino effect. then the world is DONZZZZZZZZOOOOOOOOOOO

  • 01.06.2013 7:07 PM PDT

Do you really want to know?


Posted by: Mind Reaper 771

Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.
Virus = Living, so therefore would be consider biological.

I voted chemical.


Wrong.

Viruses are not alive.

  • 01.06.2013 7:08 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4