Off Topic: The Flood
This topic has moved here: Subject: Which type of warfare is most terrifying?
  • Subject: Which type of warfare is most terrifying?
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4
Subject: Which type of warfare is most terrifying?
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

The Last Fighter


Posted by: I IRONMAN I

Posted by: Mind Reaper 771

Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.
Virus = Living, so therefore would be consider biological.

I voted chemical.


Wrong.

Viruses are not alive.


Ehhh...I can't completely agree with that. They meet the majority of the requirements to be considered "alive" but fail a few of them. It's a bit in the gray area.

  • 01.06.2013 7:16 PM PDT
  • gamertag: Co M4N
  • user homepage:

Nukes aren't terrifying. You're dead instantly, something more slow is, like chemical.

  • 01.06.2013 7:18 PM PDT

Psychological

  • 01.06.2013 7:31 PM PDT

Trench.

  • 01.06.2013 7:36 PM PDT

Brainwashing, idiotic media: "hur dur, vido gaems cas vilenc n iz nt gud. dey ned 2 b baned."

Logic: Really? Then please explain how there's violence in third world countries. I guess they're all poor due to the large amount of video games they buy.

Radiological warfare AKA the use of a dirty bomb.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiological_weapon

living near the world's largest naval base, the threat of a dirty bomb is very real.

[Edited on 01.06.2013 7:37 PM PST]

  • 01.06.2013 7:36 PM PDT

The human element always mucks things up.

Sexy warfare is best warfare.

  • 01.06.2013 7:37 PM PDT

Just remember that no matter how terrible you feel, or how much you want to let go, there are people who care about you and love you.

Biological

  • 01.06.2013 7:38 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: I IRONMAN I

Posted by: Mind Reaper 771

Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.
Virus = Living, so therefore would be consider biological.

I voted chemical.


Wrong.

Viruses are not alive.


They're not alive the way we know life.

There's a distinction.

  • 01.06.2013 7:40 PM PDT

Well personally I say Guerrilla Warfare but since that isn't an option i'm going with nuclear. If your not in the epicenter and survive everything goes to hell due to radiation.

  • 01.06.2013 7:42 PM PDT

Hey, how's it going?

Xbox Ambassador

Ambassador Support Chat

Biological and chemical. If it were nuclear, we'd literally disintegrate, so it'll be quick.

Cyber?I'm sure that goes on today but we don't know because most of us aren't associated with that work.

  • 01.06.2013 7:43 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: Co M4N
Nukes aren't terrifying. You're dead instantly, something more slow is, like chemical.


Not always. If you're not right where the bomb hits, but still close, the sheer heat will melt your skin and eyes. You won't die right away though. Instead you'll be forced to crawl around amid the fire and ruin, in excruciating pain, unable to see or hear because you have no eyes to see with or ears to hear with, sicker and sicker from the radiation, feeling your body shut down. Death will come quick but not nearly quick enough.

If you're farther out you'll fare much better, and only be blasted with enough radiation to get cancer a hundred times over. Or less, the farther you happen to be when the nuke falls.

  • 01.06.2013 7:44 PM PDT

What exactly is the difference between biological and chemical warfare?

  • 01.06.2013 7:45 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

My PC Build
i7 990x Extreme Edition
Asus Rampage III Formula
2 x Radeon HD 6950 2gb
Antec 1200 Case
Patriot Viper Xtreme 2000 mhz 24 gb (6 x 4)
"Last Name ever, first name Greatest"

Cyber in all honesty. Think about it. It can control the rest of the types of warfare, and it has a high probability.

  • 01.06.2013 7:45 PM PDT

Da Husk.


Posted by: Lolmenade
Biological and chemical. If it were nuclear, we'd literally disintegrate, so it'll be quick.

Cyber?I'm sure that goes on today but we don't know because most of us aren't associated with that work.

A group of hackers managed to hack a car and comandeer it from a laptop. If that's not scary I don't know what is.

  • 01.06.2013 7:46 PM PDT

Hey, how's it going?

Xbox Ambassador

Ambassador Support Chat


Posted by: And Im Here Too
Posted by: Co M4N
Nukes aren't terrifying. You're dead instantly, something more slow is, like chemical.


Not always. If you're not right where the bomb hits, but still close, the sheer heat will melt your skin and eyes. You won't die right away though. Instead you'll be forced to crawl around amid the fire and ruin, in excruciating pain, unable to see or hear because you have no eyes to see with or ears to hear with, sicker and sicker from the radiation, feeling your body shut down. Death will come quick but not nearly quick enough.

If you're farther out you'll fare much better, and only be blasted with enough radiation to get cancer a hundred times over. Or less, the farther you happen to be when the nuke falls.

I'd think that there'd be more than one going off though, and with the range that the missiles we have today are capable of? Personally I think we'd feel it for seconds, if that.

  • 01.06.2013 7:46 PM PDT

I would have to go with biological warfare.

  • 01.06.2013 7:46 PM PDT

Hey, how's it going?

Xbox Ambassador

Ambassador Support Chat


Posted by: husky1994

Posted by: Lolmenade
Biological and chemical. If it were nuclear, we'd literally disintegrate, so it'll be quick.

Cyber?I'm sure that goes on today but we don't know because most of us aren't associated with that work.

A group of hackers managed to hack a car and comandeer it from a laptop. If that's not scary I don't know what is.

I was thinking more on a global scale.

  • 01.06.2013 7:47 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Hey, uh, if you like vs threads, then check out this little group right here, if you have the time. It's pretty fun, just hop right in.

Posted by: Dredd
What exactly is the difference between biological and chemical warfare?


Biological involves the weaponization of viral and bacterial illnesses.

Chemical involves poisons and other agents. Think gas chambers.

  • 01.06.2013 7:47 PM PDT

"There's this theory that if there were an infinite number of monkeys pecking away at typewriters, they would eventually write the great works of Shakespeare, but thanks to the internet we now know that's not true." -Adam Savage

"Time is not made out of lines. It is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round." -Caboose

NOTE: This is my new primary account. My old account was AgentCOPP1, and I changed it because it was linked to a gamertag that I no longer use.

Posted by: shadowknight566
Chemical, because there's so much dangerous chemicals in the world that it would be a nightmare if they were harnessed into a weapon.

I'm not sure if an intentional release of a deadly virus falls under chemical or biological, though.

With chemical, you're just worried about bombs and possibly contaminated areas. With biological, every person you see could be a deadly bomb. That's much more scary.

  • 01.06.2013 7:49 PM PDT
  • gamertag: [none]
  • user homepage:

Astronomy FTW

Tubas Represent!

Biological warfare?

I've heard of nuclear and chemical, but never biological.

  • 01.06.2013 7:50 PM PDT

Da Husk.


Posted by: Lolmenade

Posted by: husky1994

Posted by: Lolmenade
Biological and chemical. If it were nuclear, we'd literally disintegrate, so it'll be quick.

Cyber?I'm sure that goes on today but we don't know because most of us aren't associated with that work.

A group of hackers managed to hack a car and comandeer it from a laptop. If that's not scary I don't know what is.

I was thinking more on a global scale.

If they can hack a car, they can surely find a way to hack military vehicles. Hell, didn't a group of hackers shut down a nuclear facility in Iran?

  • 01.06.2013 7:51 PM PDT

Hey, how's it going?

Xbox Ambassador

Ambassador Support Chat


Posted by: ansac11
Biological warfare?

I've heard of nuclear and chemical, but never biological.

Think of something like the black death.

  • 01.06.2013 7:51 PM PDT

Posted by: ansac11
Biological warfare?

I've heard of nuclear and chemical, but never biological.
Yo.

  • 01.06.2013 7:52 PM PDT

Da Husk.


Posted by: Lolmenade

Posted by: ansac11
Biological warfare?

I've heard of nuclear and chemical, but never biological.

Think of something like the black death.

Or Ebola...

  • 01.06.2013 7:52 PM PDT
  •  | 
  • Fabled Legendary Member

I understand nothing because my life is a conspiracy.


Posted by: SoarinWonderbolt
Biological.

Being eaten alive by a flesh eating virus doesn't sound too fun.

  • 01.06.2013 7:53 PM PDT

  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • of 4