- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: SS_Zag1
I'll post it again then.. Repeat thread, repeat post.
1) To incorporate the Pelican, it would require MUCH larger maps.
2) To incorporate MUCH larger maps, would require more players. (24+ players)
3) To incorporate more players would require more bandwidth (more lag), less visual detail, a complete overhaul in Halo gameplay as we know it, and less organized team warfare.
4) To incorporate said things would require Halo to suddenly become Battlefield. It wouldn't be Halo. It'd be some screwed over hybrid that wasn't very fun to play. Incorporating something into the game, as simple as the flyable pelican, would almost definatly ammount to sale losses on Microsoft's and Bungie's part.
If you all want to play that kind of game, just go play Battlefield. It's a great series. Please, this isn't even reasonable.
zzzzzz.... SNo0o0oree...zzzzzzz hu, what, this is halo 3 moron, on the xbox 360. Expect bigger maps, vehicles and 32 MP levels on 360 live. Amazing how technology advances (aka evolves, as Halo gameplay has from 1 to 2 and certainly shall in 3 as well).
You should be ashamed of yourself for posting such tripe... Adding more players results in a need for more organized play to use large transports such as the pelican.... As for a larger slayer level, that justmeans more vehicle warfare aka more CARNAGE! Also, levels wouldn't need to be much large if the pelican were smalller... say twice to three times the size of a banshee, for instantance... thats the whole point of this thread, which means its obviously not a repeat... so why don't you go flame your own repeat post...zzzz...SNORE..zzzz... READ BEFORE YOU WRITE PEOPLE!