- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
Posted by: ChiefofAntarctic
Posted by: Vitamin Zawaz
I for one definitely agree that the biblical references are stretched out way too much. I've actually disproven the "Halo flood = sin" argument. And "the storm around the Ark" theory is also false in terms of the storm featured in the trailer.
I would really like to see how you proved the Halo Flood doesn't represent sin. Proved is a pretty strong word, and none of us good theorists have ever said we proved anything.Okay.
A lot of people think that flood represent sin because they "infect" humans and covenant and shape them into evil things. A lot of people think this because of Cortana's quote in halo 1:"Human, covenant, whatever...we are all equally edible." Because this quote can relate with the fact that "sin" can affect anyone, no matter what religion you are.
Well, we are forgetting one thing that the flood CAN'T infect: the hunter. Now, if the flood was a direct correlation with sin, then this hunter inconsistency would imply that there are a few things that are invincible toward sin. But nothing is. Therefore, flood does not equal sin.
Hm, I think I'll accept that, for now at least. Of course, I'm kind of debating if Hunters are actually an intelligent species (well, I suppose in the game none of them really are, but you know what I mean) because if they aren't then they wouldn't be susceptible anyway. Of course, the main thinking behind this is the reference to the "taming of the Hunters." You don't tame intelligent species, only animals. But, that, at least for now, lacks any sort of real evidence, so I suppose I'll go along with your proof of that. Luckily for me, however, that connection actually has nothing to do with my theory, my theory comes from the Flood representing the Fifth Trumpet things, which they still do.