- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: SS_Zag1
Posted by: UL71M4 G33K
Nothing larger than 3 times that of coag. If BF2:MC can do it, why not H3?
1) If you like BF2:MC so much, go play it.
2) Halo isn't, and wasn't meant for such large maps. The gameplay as we know it would be completely changed to do so. It'd probably be a lot less fun.
3) To make such large maps, one must cut down on graphics and detail.. If you want Halo 3 to look like BF2:MC... Eww.
1) BF2:MC is a horrible, very unbalanced game
2) Larger maps wouldnt kill halo, it would expand upon it. You dont have to play the large maps. But having larger maps would allow for more players, more expansive battles, and a wider range of vehicle possibilities. Im thinking a pelican wouldnt fit too well inside of coag. Its a little small for that.
3) If they said you would have those graphics (H3 graphics), with 14 miles of actually rendered stuff in the game (that is MUCH larger than 3 coags), then i dont think my idea would be a stress.