Halo 3 Forum
This topic has moved here: Poll [27 votes]: Should Halo 3 have a troop transport wart hog like the picture prov...
  • Poll [27 votes]: Should Halo 3 have a troop transport wart hog like the picture prov...
Subject: Should Halo 3 have a troop transport hog?

Just remember... I keep it real...

Poll: Should Halo 3 have a troop transport wart hog like the picture prov...  [closed]
yes:  78%
(21 Votes)
no:  11%
(3 Votes)
one similar:  11%
(3 Votes)
no troop hog:  0%
(0 Votes)
Total Votes: 27

Should Halo 3 have a troop transport wart hog? I know that there are a couple of threads about this already, and I am sorry, but I have provided a picture. I personally think the troop tansport hog would be a good idea. It would look like the picture, but the only thing I would change is that the front passanger seat would have an automatic weapon for defence. The back seat where the gun usually is would hold about 4 people.

The picture is below, I don't lazy link. Sorry.

http://the-junkyard.net/images/vehicles/halo2/warthog_troops. jpg

take away the " " at the end of the url

[Edited on 7/21/2006]

  • 07.21.2006 12:45 PM PDT

PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME GROUP INVITATIONS

The Halo REACH Script (post thoughts in thread)

Writing Lead of Whisper Studios. Check out Heron!

Look... I'm on bungiepedia!

Howbout an APC?

  • 07.21.2006 1:10 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Sure.

  • 07.21.2006 1:16 PM PDT

Just remember... I keep it real...

that wouldn't be a bad idea. its just that with the wart hog also being a troop transprt, there isn't a need to completely design a new vehicle from scratch. Also, everyone already knows how to use one.

  • 07.21.2006 1:16 PM PDT

"The Troop Transport. The Troop Carrier. The Action Figure Storage Vehicle"

-Strong Bad, homestarrunner.com

But on topic, the current Warthog is all I need.

  • 07.21.2006 1:29 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: jmh9072
"The Troop Transport. The Troop Carrier. The Action Figure Storage Vehicle"

-Strong Bad, homestarrunner.com

But on topic, the current Warthog is all I need.


i agree - nothing against you, thread creator, but the troop transport is the spectre, no matter how useless it is

  • 07.21.2006 1:41 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Yeah, lets pile all eight team members into one death trap so I can hit the SOB with a rocket launcher. Killtacular!

  • 07.21.2006 1:46 PM PDT

Doc: "i'm a pacifist"
Caboose: "your a thing that babies suck on?"
Tucker: "no dude, that's a pedephile"
Church: "tucker, i think he means a pacifier"

Posted by: The Lone Heretic
Yeah, lets pile all eight team members into one death trap so I can hit the SOB with a rocket launcher. Killtacular!


the man has a point

  • 07.21.2006 1:49 PM PDT

Dawn of the Dead video Here
6 Minutes of Hell video here

I would like to see a trasnport hog, only if there are big battles that require it.

  • 07.21.2006 1:55 PM PDT

ლ(ಠ_ಠლ),ಠ_ಠ,ʘ_ʘ,ಥ_ಥ,ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ ,ᶘ ಠᴥಠᶅ,ᶘᵒᴥᵒ ʘ‿ʘᶅʕ·͡ᴥ·ʔ@[393703897340448:]

I want the hog transport and its counter part which is the shadow.

  • 07.21.2006 1:55 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

yes, lets kill those noobs with two people who have rocket launchers to give your team atleast 18 points closer to winning, oh wait your team already won!!!

  • 07.21.2006 2:06 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

that would be sweeet it could carry 4 people in the back and a gunner on the top and you the driver so 6 people andif its destiod the driver and gunner die but the peaple inside live because they should be protected by a stong tank armor

  • 07.21.2006 2:22 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Hunter740
that would be sweeet it could carry 4 people in the back and a gunner on the top and you the driver so 6 people andif its destiod the driver and gunner die but the peaple inside live because they should be protected by a stong tank armor

and yet it takes two rockets to kill a tank driver?
dumb idea to me


[Edited on 7/21/2006]

  • 07.21.2006 2:23 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: the sargism
Posted by: Hunter740
that would be sweeet it could carry 4 people in the back and a gunner on the top and you the driver so 6 people andif its destiod the driver and gunner die but the peaple inside live because they should be protected by a stong tank armor

and yet it takes two rockets to kill a tank driver?
dumb idea to me


i never said one rocket to kill plus the people in the back will have more protectsion so if it is destiod the people will get out and fight any enemy around

  • 07.21.2006 2:30 PM PDT
  • gamertag:
  • user homepage:
  • last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT

Posted by: Hunter740
Posted by: the sargism
Posted by: Hunter740
that would be sweeet it could carry 4 people in the back and a gunner on the top and you the driver so 6 people andif its destiod the driver and gunner die but the peaple inside live because they should be protected by a stong tank armor

and yet it takes two rockets to kill a tank driver?
dumb idea to me


i never said one rocket to kill plus the people in the back will have more protectsion so if it is destiod the people will get out and fight any enemy around

so your saying energy shields should be stronger to with stand 2 rockets and an exploding vehicle?

  • 07.21.2006 2:33 PM PDT

ლ(ಠ_ಠლ),ಠ_ಠ,ʘ_ʘ,ಥ_ಥ,ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ ,ᶘ ಠᴥಠᶅ,ᶘᵒᴥᵒ ʘ‿ʘᶅʕ·͡ᴥ·ʔ@[393703897340448:]

I want the transport hog and the shadow.

  • 07.21.2006 2:45 PM PDT