- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
Posted by: Texas Ben
I never got what was so great about them anyways... there are no good shooters for the consoles besides halo and goldeneye (and soon halo 2), there are no RTS, and probbrabbly never will be. the precision and speed offered by the controller is marginal when compared to that of mouse+keyboard, and more difficult overall. also, the graphical power of consoles is far far inferior to that of a PC, and most games are locked at 30FPS (choppy... a good PC will run games at 60-80 FPS). Additionally, the overall quality of any console is less than that of a PC. Now, I realize that a console will better tailor to the needs of a 'casual gamer' who is either too stupid or too lazy to get a high-end gaming rig, but I have seen many console users who claim to be "1337 |-|4/"|)c0/"3" (most 13-16), but have never even heard of such pillars such as starcraft, doom, wolfenstein, quake, etc. this alarms me greatly. are there no new PC gamers out there anymore? Is my generation doomed to be the last while suceeding generations will degenrate into hopeless console morons? this is unacceptable.
--
why the hell am I posting this here? most of you are 13-yr old console morons anyway. oh well. if you are, damn you. consoles are okay, but only as a supplement too the PC. If you arent... good job. you inspire confidence.
Didnt a red alert or command and conquer game come out way back when on a console? I believe it was N64 it came out on. And just for your info, I'm 17, not part of your stereotypical "13-yr old console morons."
Oh, btw, I'm a PC gamer. I'm just open to every other type of game (but I'm more inclined to PC gaming.)
Yup I was right. There was a command and conquer for N64. Lazy There was also Army men for N64. They considered that as an RTS.
[Edited on 10/17/2004 9:42:02 PM]