- Achronos
- |
- Bungie.net Overlord
Tom Achronos
Bungie.net Overlord
twitter: http://twitter.com/Achronos
"I have no words that would do justice to the atrocities you commit to the English language, as well as your continued assaults on the concepts of basic literacy and logical reasoning."
As he is busy and doubt he will reply, and I am waiting for something to compile, I will answer.
Posted by: KSI SEVEN 7
Shiska, did you honestly read the entire thread? If not then please do... I acknowleged that you bash both sides, what im saying is that you said you personally dislike MLG.... how does that belong in any policy
I wonder the same thing of you. Do you not realize that you could basically replace the word "dislike" with "like" and use the same post he made as evidence? Because if you want one example of why nobody seems to be on your side, that is it: you acknowledge only parts of things that say bad things about what you like, and ignore the existence of other content. This is illogical and is like talking to a wall.
I assumed somthing? How about you assumed somthing, like o WAIT that i wasnt around back then, I was... so good job on being a hypocrite.
Stop trying to twist words, again. You did assume a lot, and his assumption is based on your join date. If that isn't accurate, maybe you had a duplicate account, hmmmm? His assumption is not relevant to this discussion, where as yours are, and without which, everything falls apart.
6 is faulty logic, how can you tell how many MLG players there are based on usage stats, when there isnt a playlist that is MLG????
We can see every Xbox Live game played of Halo 2, including customs. It isn't that hard to do a query based on gametype. The popularity of the Hardcore playlists also gives us a good indication of people who tend toward that style of play. This goes back to you assuming things about our data collection just because you don't see evidence of it - that is not smart of you.
and im not acting like you did some horrible thing, im saying that you posted in an unprofessional manner, and that the base rule itself is bad, and you couldve taken a different path to releive the spam, and flaming by making those against the rules and persuing people who acted against those rules.
I don't know, but being called "unprofessional" is a pretty big assault on his integrity. And considering how flimsy your supporting evidence is... what did you expect?
What did you mean when you said that then?, if you didnt mean it in a bad way than what way did you mean it? If you didnt mean it in any way than why did you say it? If there is no reason for you to have said it than why are you complaining about me saying that you shouldnt have said it? Should bias be in a policy? Would my suggestion of changing the ruleset work?
1. Already answered - each side was being told why their discussion was banned.
2. What do you mean, in a bad way? As in the MLG guys were acting like idiots? Yeah, they were. So was the opposition.
3. There was every reason for him to say those things. If you actually saw what was going on (although you claim to have), then you'd understand.
4. It isn't.
5. No, it wouldn't, because those already were the rules. The gag order on that topic was put in place because the rules weren't being followed.