- last post: 01.01.0001 12:00 AM PDT
It really is too bad. They're complaining that IGN compared it to Halo, in the review.
#1. Halo is a three year old game. It is the benchmark for FPS.
#2. If you look at the Killzone threads, they mention Halo about the same amount of times as Killzone. They have high hopes, for sure
#3. Killzone just wasn't that good. It just wasn't. They had a small dev team, new to the market, underpowered console for true graphical bliss...
They're rabid fanboys. Killzone was hyped up, because it was to fill a void on the PS2.
What sickens me is that these people will not appreciate a decent game, because it is on a different system.